Table 2.
Results of mismatch distribution analysis and neutrality tests for four Rhodiola species based on ITS sequences and cpDNA sequences
| Dataset | Species | τ | SSD | P-value | HRag | P-value | Tajima’s D | P-value | Fs | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | R. bupleuroides | 0.774 | 0.045 | 0.014 | 0.137 | 0.094 | –0.190 | 0.846 | 0.261 | NA |
| R. discolor | 2.502 | 0.086 | 0.140 | 0.321 | 0.296 | 0.393 | 0.761 | 2.002 | NA | |
| R. fastigiata | 0.298 | 0.064 | 0.099 | 0.162 | 0.177 | 0.539 | 0.954 | 0.981 | NA | |
| R. chrysanthemifolia | 3.758 | 0.068 | 0.106 | 0.190 | 0.127 | 0.650 | 0.904 | 1.376 | NA | |
| cpDNA | R. bupleuroides | 8.173 | 0.196 | 0.173 | 0.310 | 0.516 | 0.407 | 0.652 | 2.562 | 0.827 |
| R. discolor | 11.168 | 0.165 | 0.100 | 0.295 | 0.281 | 0.121 | 0.568 | 3.359 | 0.848 | |
| R. fastigiata | 36.903 | 0.215 | 0.031 | 0.345 | 0.404 | –0.378 | 0.515 | 5.376 | NA | |
| R. chrysanthemifolia | 1.524 | 0.125 | 0.036 | 0.182 | 0.267 | –0.177 | 0.720 | 2.093 | NA |
τ, the mode of the mismatch distribution; SSD, the sum of squared deviations; HRag, the raggedness index.