Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 1;26(1):13–18. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_477_20

Table 3.

Comparison of mean probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level (mm), and gingival crevicular fluid free haem concentration (ng/ml) between healthy and diseased sites in nonsmokers and smokers group using Student’s paired t-test

Variables Sites n Nonsmokers Smokers


Mean±SD Mean difference P Mean±SD Mean difference P
PPD Healthy site 39 2.31±0.44 −3.11 <0.001* (S) 1.48±0.20 −3.79 <0.001* (S)
Diseased site 39 5.42±0.61 5.27±0.56
CAL Healthy site 39 1.64±0.43 −3.34 <0.001* (S) 1.47±0.18 −3.61 <0.001* (S)
Diseased site 39 4.98±0.65 5.08±0.56
GCF free haem concentration Healthy site 39 21.95±4.86 −4.75 <0.001* (S) 22.90±3.60 −3.08 0.005* (S)
Diseased site 39 26.70±4.80 25.98±4.83

*Statistically significant. S – Statistically significant (P<0.001) (P<0.005); n – Sample size; SD – Standard deviation; PPD – Probing pocket depth; CAL – Clinical attachment level; GCF – Gingival crevicular fluid; mm – Millimeter; ng/ml – Nanogram/milliliter; P – Level of Significance