Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 1;26(1):37–43. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_519_20

Table 4.

Comparison of mean percentage reduction of values of the parameters from pretreatment to posttreatment studied between male and female in generalized chronic periodontitis group

Mean percentage reduction from pretreatment to posttreatment Sex n Mean±SD SEM t-value P
PI Male 11 62.40±8.59 2.48 0.430 0.670 (NS)
Female 19 63.60±7.14 1.55
PBI Male 11 56.99±9.77 2.82 0.230 0.820 (NS)
Female 19 57.93±12.03 2.62
PD (mm) Male 11 52.26±11.02 3.18 0.787 0.438 (NS)
Female 19 55.17±9.71 2.12
CAL (mm) Male 11 45.38±8.51 2.45 0.439 0.664 (NS)
Female 19 46.98±10.80 2.35
ROM plasma (CARR U) Male 11 48.28±23.22 6.70 0.475 0.638 (NS)
Female 19 52.40±24.29 5.30
ROM saliva (CARR U) Male 11 47.43±19.35 5.58 1.222 0.231 (NS)
Female 19 55.74±18.51 4.03
ROM GCF (CARR U) Male 11 39.16±23.64 6.82 1.856 0.073 (NS)
Female 19 54.23±21.76 4.75

NS (P>0.05). NS – Not significant; n – Number of patients; t-value – Size of the difference; P – Probability value; SD – Standard deviation; PI – Plaque index; PBI - Papillary bleeding index; PD – Probing depth; CAL – Clinical attachment level; ROM – Reactive oxygen metabolite; GCF – Gingival crevicular fluid; CARR U – Carratelli units; SEM Standard error of the mean