Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;2(7):e211460. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1460

Table 1. Prevalence and Magnitude of Potential Surprise Bills According to the Occurrence of Cesarean Delivery and Neonatal Intensive Care.

Outcome All deliveries (N = 95 384)a ≥1 Cesarean delivery claim (n = 32 203)b No cesarean delivery claims (n = 63 181)b Difference between medians (95% CI)c
Deliveries
No potential surprise bills, No. (%) 83 193 (87.2) 25 609 (79.5) 57 854 (91.1) NA
≥1 Potential surprise bill, No. (%) 12 191 (12.8) 6594 (20.5) 5597 (8.9) NA
Median estimated liability for potential surprise bills (25th-75th percentile), $d 1356 (180-4595) 1825 (272-5624) 900 (124-3642) 925 (760-1091)
Newborn hospitalizations All newborn hospitalizations (n = 96 881) a ≥1 Neonatal intensive care claim (n = 5970) b No neonatal intensive care claims (n = 90 991) b Difference between medians (95% CI) c
No potential surprise bills, episodes, No. (%) 87 854 (90.7) 5044 (84.5) 82 810 (91.1) NA
≥1 Potential surprise bill, episodes, No. (%) 9027 (9.3) 926 (15.5) 8101 (8.9) NA
Median estimated liability for potential surprise bills (25th-75th percentile), $d 262 (123-766) 1282 (217-10 472) 262 (123-622) 1031 (971-1091)

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

The 95 384 families were linked to 96 881 newborn hospitalizations. Among the 95 384 families, 93 910 had deliveries linked to 1 newborn hospitalization, 1451 had deliveries linked to 2 newborn hospitalizations, and 23 had deliveries linked to 3 newborn hospitalizations. For the latter 2 groups, the multiple newborn hospitalizations were for unique newborns.

b

See eAppendix 2 in the Supplement for codes used to define these claims.

c

May not equal the difference between columns 2 and 3 because of rounding. We calculated confidence intervals using quantile regression.

d

Equals out-of-network charge minus standardized cost, an estimate of the insurer’s national average in-network reimbursement.