Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;9(9):5484–5492. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-1573

Table 2. Comparison of pathologic characteristics between LLH and OLH groups before and after PSM.

Characteristics Before matching After matching
LLH (n=35) OLH (n=241) P LLH (n=27) OLH (n=52) P
Tumor size (cm) 5.2±2.2 6.7±3.8 0.001* 5.1±2.3 5.3±2.9 0.785*
Tumor number, n (%) 1.000 0.114
   Solitary 33 (94.3) 224 (92.9) 25 (92.6) 52 (100.0)
   Multiple 2 (5.7) 17 (7.1) 2 (7.4) 0 (0.0)
Tumor border, n (%) 0.155 0.514
   Clear 35 (100.0) 221 (91.7) 27 (100.0) 49 (94.2)
   Unclear 0 (0.0) 20 (8.3) 0 (0.0) 3 (5.8)
Encapsulation, n (%) 0.115 0.246
   Complete 28 (80.0) 152 (63.1) 23 (85.2) 37 (71.2)
   Incomplete 2 (5.7) 14 (5.8) 1 (3.7) 1 (1.9)
   None 5 (14.3) 75 (31.1) 3 (11.1) 14 (26.9)
Differentiation, n (%) 0.020 0.659
   Grade I 1 (2.9) 9 (3.7) 1 (3.7) 4 (7.7)
   Grade II 21 (60.0) 194 (80.5) 19 (70.4) 38 (73.1)
   Grade III 13 (37.1) 37 (15.4) 7 (25.9) 10 (19.2)
   Grade IV 0 (0.0) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Tumor necrosis, n (%) 8 (22.9) 61 (25.3) 0.754 5 (18.5) 13 (25.0) 0.515
Tumor hemorrhage, n (%) 1 (2.9) 2 (0.8) 0.335 1 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 0.342
Micro-vascular invasion, n (%) 14 (40.0) 39 (16.2) 0.001 6 (22.2) 15 (28.8) 0.527
TNM staging, n (%) 0.022 0.438
   I 26 (74.3) 111 (46.1) 18 (66.7) 30 (57.7)
   II 9 (25.7) 112 (46.5) 9 (33.3) 22 (42.3)
   IIIA 0 (0.0) 11 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
   IIIB 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
   IIIC 0 (0.0) 7 (2.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Cirrhosis, n (%) 24 (68.6) 159 (66.0) 0.761 18 (66.7) 34 (65.4) 0.909

*, Student’s t-test; , Fisher’s exact test. LLH, indicates laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy; OLH, open left hemihepatectomy; PSM, propensity score matching; TNM, Tumor Node Metastasis.