Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;9(9):5245–5254. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-604

Table 3. Distribution and composition ratios of mNGS detection of pathogenic microorganisms in the patients’ lung tissues and alveolar lavage fluid (%).

Pathogenic microorganism TBLB BALF
Number of strains Composition ratio Number of strains Composition ratio
Prokaryotic microorganism 48 44.44 52 44.44
   Actinomyces odontolyticus 4 3.70 5 4.27
   Enterococcus faecium 4 3.70 2 1.71
   Nocardia cyriacigeorgica 2 1.85 2 1.71
   Nocardia africana 1 0.93 1 0.85
   Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8 7.41 11 9.40
   Acinetobacter baumannii 8 7.41 9 7.69
   Klebsiella pneumoniae 8 7.41 10 8.55
   Enterobacter hormaechei 2 1.85 2 1.71
   Chlamydia psittaci 1 0.93 0 0
   Mycobacterium tuberculosis 9 8.33 9 7.69
   Mycobacterium kansasii 1 0.93 1 0.85
Eukaryotic microorganism 29 26.85 32 27.35
   Pneumocystis jirovercii 12 11.10 12 10.26
   Cryptococcus neoformans 3 2.78 2 1.71
   Aspergillus oryzae 6 5.56 5 4.27
   Aspergillus fumigatus 3 2.78 6 5.13
   Aspergillus niger 1 0.93 3 2.56
   Aspergillus flavus 2 1.85 2 1.71
   Aspergillus tubingensis 1 0.93 1 0.85
   Rhizopus delemar 1 0.93 1 0.85
Virus 31 28.70 33 28.21
   Human betaherpesvirus 5 15 13.89 18 15.38
   Human gammaherpesvirus 4 8 7.41 9 7.69
   Human alphaherpesvirus 1 8 7.41 6 5.13
Total 108 100.00 117 100.00

All values are indicated as the number of strains and percentage. mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing; TBLB, transbronchial lung biopsy; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.