Table 4. The performance of the predictive model using the XGBoost.
Modality | AUC | Accuracy | Degree | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | – | – | (I) Mild | 81.39 | 20.10 |
0.49 | 0.56 | (II) Moderate | 13.33 | 83.87 | |
– | – | (III) Severe | 3.33 | 96.20 | |
T2 | – | – | (I) Mild | 84.04 | 6.71 |
0.49 | 0.55 | (II) Moderate | 4.00 | 88.45 | |
– | – | (III) Severe | 3.00 | 96.60 | |
T1 + C | – | – | (I) Mild | 81.35 | 19.29 |
0.49 | 0.57 | (II) Moderate | 17.33 | 83.34 | |
– | – | (III) Severe | 0.20 | 97.73 | |
T1 + T2 + T1 + C | – | (I) Mild | 85.09 | 14.52 | |
0.49 | 0.58 | (II) Moderate | 13.33 | 88.93 | |
– | – | (III) Severe | 3.00 | 96.58 | |
CT | – | – | (I) Mild | 98.74 | 2.09 |
0.69 | 0.65 | (II) Moderate | 2.15 | 98.66 | |
– | – | (III) Severe | 0.00 | 100.00 |
AUC, area under the curve; T1, T1-weighted scans; T1 + C, T1 post-contrast cans; T2, T2-weighted scans; CT, computed tomography.