Table 2. Quality assessment of OCSs by NOS scale.
Study | Items | Wästerlid 2017 (20) | Knauf 2019 (19) |
---|---|---|---|
Selection | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | * | * |
Selection of the non-exposed cohort | * | * | |
Ascertainment of exposure | * | * | |
Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | * | * | |
Comparability | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | ** | ** |
Outcome | Assessment of outcome | * | * |
Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | * | * | |
Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | * | * |
*, star-rating in NOS, each study can have a maximum of one star per entry in “Selection”, “Outcome” and a maximum of two stars per entry in “Comparability”. OCSs, observational comparative studies; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa scale.