Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb;10(2):748–758. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2539

Table 5. Analysis of factors predicting OS.

Items Cox’s regression model
P value HR 95% CI
Lower Higher
Univariate Cox’s regression
   CXCL1 high <0.001 1.889 1.363 2.618
   CXCL2 high 0.015 1.497 1.080 2.074
   CXCL8 high 0.164 1.266 0.908 1.763
   Age (>60 years) 0.154 1.262 0.916 1.740
   Male 0.346 1.189 0.830 1.704
   History smoke 0.361 0.862 0.626 1.186
   History drink 0.534 1.108 0.802 1.529
   Hypertension 0.766 0.951 0.683 1.324
   Hyperlipidemia 0.677 0.929 0.655 1.317
   Diabetes 0.340 0.814 0.533 1.243
   Poor differentiation 0.019 1.325 1.047 1.676
   Tumor size 0.001 1.700 1.233 2.344
   LYN metastasis <0.001 3.219 2.323 4.458
   TNM stage <0.001 1.485 1.223 1.804
   Abnormal CEA level* 0.002 1.685 1.205 2.355
Forward stepwise multivariate Cox’s regression
   CXCL1 high 0.004 1.628 1.167 2.273
   Poor differentiation 0.029 1.328 1.029 1.714
   LYN metastasis <0.001 2.983 2.142 4.154
   Abnormal CEA level* 0.006 1.612 1.151 2.259

Factors with P value less than 0.05 in univariate Cox’s regression were included in forward stepwise multivariate Cox’s regression. *, normal CEA level ≤5 ng/mL and abnormal CEA level >5 ng/mL. OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CXCL, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand; LYN, lymph node; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.