Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;9(3):1536–1546. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.47

Table 3. The sensitivity analyses of the study.

Sensitivity analyses No of studies ORR DCR PFS OS
Studies No. (No. of patients) RR (95% CI) Studies No. (No. of patients) RR (95% CI) Studies No. (No. of patients) HR (95% CI) Studies No. (No. of patients) HR (95% CI)
Total studies 9 8 (n=1,149) 2.16 (1.47–3.17) 8 (n=1,149) 1.68 (1.49–1.89) 4 (n=686) 0.50 (0.41–0.59) 3 (n=605) 0.77 (0.63–0.95)
Hensley et al. excluded 8 7 (n=1,042) 3.20 (1.85–5.52) 7 (n=1,042) 1.78 (1.56–2.04) 3 (n=579) 0.41 (0.34–0.50) 2 (n=498) 0.73 (0.59–0.91)
Mir (Regorafenib) et al. excluded 8 7 (n=968) 2.10 (1.42–3.10) 7 (n=968) 1.69 (1.47–1.93) 4 (n=686) 0.50 (0.41–0.59) 3 (n=605) 0.77 (0.63–0.95)
Mir (Pazopanib) et al. excluded 9 8 (n=1,149) 2.16 (1.47–3.17) 8 (n=1,149) 1.68 (1.49–1.89) 3 (n=605) 0.48 (0.40–0.58) 3 (n=605) 0.77 (0.63–0.95)
van der Graaf et al. excluded 8 7 (n=780) 1.91 (1.30–2.81) 7 (n=780) 1.59 (1.38–1.83) 3 (n=317) 0.78 (0.61–1.00) 2 (n=236) 0.65 (0.46–0.90)
Zhang et al. excluded 8 7 (n=1,100) 2.09 (1.42–3.09) 7 (n=1,100) 1.66 (1.47–1.88) 4 (n=686) 0.50 (0.41–0.59) 3 (n=605) 0.77 (0.63–0.95)
Tap et al. excluded 8 7 (n=1,020) 2.36 (1.53–3.64) 7 (n=1,020) 1.78 (1.55–2.04) 3 (n=557) 0.46 (0.38–0.50) 2 (n=476) 0.90 (0.71–1.13)
Hu et al. excluded 8 7 (n=1,107) 2.11 (1.40–3.20) 7 (n=1,107) 1.66 (1.47–1.88) 4 (n=686) 0.50 (0.41–0.59) 3 (n=605) 0.77 (0.63–0.95)
Chi et al. excluded 8 7 (n=916) 1.93 (1.31–2.85) 7 (n=916) 1.59 (1.40–1.79) 4 (n=686) 0.50 (0.41–0.59) 3 (n=605) 0.77 (0.63–0.95)
Liu et al. excluded 8 7 (n=1,110) 2.13 (1.45–3.13) 7 (n=1,110) 1.67 (1.48–1.88) 4 (n=686) 0.50 (0.41–0.59) 3 (n=605) 0.77 (0.63–0.95)

ORR, objective response rate; DCR, disease control rate; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; RR, risk ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.