Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug;9(8):4762–4769. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2039

Table 1. Correlation of patient clinicopathological features with microvessel density (MVD) and carcinoembryonic antigen-associated cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) expression in tumors.

Variables No. of patients MVDa CEACAM1 expressionb
High MVD (%) Low MVD (%) P-valuec High expression (%) Low expression (%) P-valuec
Total 80 35 (43.8) 45 (56.2) 35 (43.8) 45 (56.2)
Tumor staging
   pT1–pT2 58 23 (39.7) 35 (60.3) 0.23 24 (41.4) 34 (58.6) 0.49
   pT3–pT4 22 12 (54.5) 10 (45.5) 11 (50.0) 11 (50.0)
Lymph node involvement
   pN0 56 22 (39.3) 34 (60.7) 0.22 17 (30.4) 39 (69.6) 0.01
   pN+ 24 13 (54.2) 11 (45.8) 18 (75.0) 6 (25.0)
Tumor grading
   G1 49 17 (34.7) 32 (65.3) 0.04 18 (36.7) 31 (63.3) 0.11
   G2–G3 31 18 (58.1) 13 (41.9) 17 (54.8) 14 (45.2)
Sex
   Male 53 25 (47.2) 28 (52.8) 0.39 22 (37.7) 31 (62.3) 0.57
   Female 27 10 (37.0) 17 (63.0) 13 (55.6) 14 (44.4)
Age
   ≤63 years 42 20 (47.6) 22 (52.4) 0.46 18 (42.9) 24 (57.1) 0.86
   >63 years 38 15 (39.5) 23 (60.5) 17 (44.7) 21 (55.3)

a, MVD was categorized according to the median MVD of all tumors into low (< 30 microvessels/400× microscopic field of view) and high (≥30 microvessels/400× microscopic field of view); b, CEACAM1 expression was categorized into low (<66% of CEACAM1 positive tumor cells) and high (≥66% of CEACAM1 positive tumor cells); c, two-sided P-values were calculated by Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test to evaluate significance of correlations.