Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar;10(3):1449–1456. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2862

Table 2. The association between CXCR3 expression and clinicopathological factors in gastric cancer.

Factor Number of studies Number of patients Pooled OR
(95% CI)
P value Heterogeneity
I2 (%) P value Model
Age (old vs. young) 5 716 0.67 (0.49–0.91) 0.011 0.0 0.983 Fixed
Gender (male vs. female) 5 716 0.90 (0.63–1.27) 0.541 0.0 0.418 Fixed
Tumor size (≥5 vs. <5 cm) 3 428 0.69 (0.45–1.04) 0.077 0.0 0.997 Fixed
Tumor grade (PD vs. WD MD) 3 428 0.46 (0.29–0.73) 0.001 0.0 0.599 Fixed
Lauren classification (diffuse vs. intestinal) 4 613 0.98 (0.71–1.36) 0.914 0.0 0.949 Fixed
Tumor stage (III IV vs. I II) 5 716 0.57 (0.19–1.71) 0.315 88.7 <0.001 Random
Lymph node metastasis (present vs. absent) 3 517 0.47 (0.31–0.71) <0.001 0.0 0.427 Fixed
TNM stage (high vs. low) 4 613 0.51 (0.35–0.74) <0.001 0.0 0.826 Fixed

CI, confidence interval; CXCR3, CXC chemokine receptor 3; MD, moderately-differentiated; OR, odds ratio; PD, poorly-differentiated; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; WD, well-differentiated.