Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 29;22:122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07473-w

Table 6.

Comparison on Lean tools and methods adoption

Tools and Methods US (1) Italy (2) t-test difference
N Mean [SD] N Mean [SD] (1)–(2)
5 s: redesign of physical workspace 129 3.977 [1.320] 35 4.143 [1.115] −0.166
A3 thinking 129 3.341 [1.355] 35 3.114 [1.255] 0.227
Analysis tools such as scatter plots, Pareto charts 129 3.705 [1.208] 35 3.800 [1.256] −0.095
Daily huddles 129 4.628 [1.409] 35 4.171 [1.014] 0.456
Just-in-time process or inventory management 129 3.891 [1.427] 35 2.743 [1.221] 1.149***
Kaizen improvement events 129 3.318 [1.566] 35 2.143 [1.264] 1.175***
Mistake-proofing 129 3.318 [1.256] 35 2.886 [1.367] 0.432
Redesign for continuous flow [pull system, etc.] 130 3.469 [1.325] 35 3.571 [1.290] −0.102
PDSA 129 4.388 [1.239] 35 4.171 [1.014] 0.216
Six Sigma DMAIC methodology 130 3.115 [1.622] 35 2.971 [1.382] 0.144
Standard work 130 3.923 [1.198] 35 4.086 [1.040] −0.163
Training in process improvement tools for employees 129 3.310 [1.535] 35 2.714 [1.467] 0.596*
Value stream process mapping 130 3.477 [1.342] 35 3.629 [1.215] −0.152
Visual management such as huddle boards 128 4.070 [1.421] 35 3.743 [1.245] 0.327

The value displayed for t-tests are the differences in the means across the groups

***, **, and * indicate significance at the .1, 1, and 5% critical level respectively