Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 30;29(3):500–511. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab209

Table 2.

Performances of the predictive models

Models Candidate predictorsa AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (SD)
PPV (SD)
90% specificity 95% specificity 90% specificity 95% specificity
Fusion enhanced model Local features + fused risk scores 0.86 (0.84, 0.89) 0.70 (0.03) 0.65 (0.02) 0.082 (0.008) 0.134 (0.015)
Conventional model Local features 0.82 (0.81, 0.84) 0.42 (0.07) 0.24 (0.07) 0.050 (0.009) 0.057 (0.018)
Fusion only model Fused risk scores 0.52 (0.49, 0.55) 0.10 (0.03) 0.04 (0.03) 0.012 (0.003) 0.011 (0.006)

AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristics curve; CI: confidence interval; PPV: positive predictive value; SD: standard deviation.

a

Local features included demographics and diagnosis codes collected in target cohort, that is, HIDD cohort.