Table 4.
Comparison of the conventional model and fusion enhanced model for different level high-risk groups
| High-risk group | Gender | Both correct, N (%) | Both incorrect, N (%) | Only conventional correct, N (%) | Only fusion enhanced correct, N (%) | Improvement a (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .05 | All | 123 (25.52) | 180 (37.34) | 2 (0.41) | 177 (36.72) | 36.31 |
| .05 | Female | 87 (27.88) | 107 (34.29) | 0 (0) | 118 (37.82) | 37.82 |
| .05 | Male | 36 (21.18) | 73 (42.94) | 2 (1.18) | 59 (34.71) | 33.53 |
| .1 | All | 198 (41.08) | 135 (28.01) | 9 (1.87) | 140 (29.05) | 27.18 |
| .1 | Female | 139 (44.55) | 79 (25.32) | 5 (1.6) | 89 (28.53) | 26.93 |
| .1 | Male | 59 (34.71) | 56 (32.94) | 4 (2.35) | 51 (30) | 27.65 |
a
Improvement is computed as: only fusion enhanced right (%)—only conventional right (%)