Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 24;148(2):321–330. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03818-w

Table 5.

Comparison of the two methods for detecting mutation rates of EGFR gene

Relevant factors Method Wild type Mutant type Mutation rate (%) χ2 (Bray et al. 2018) P
Exon 18

ARMS-PCR

NGS

3603

787

62

15

1.8

1.9

0.124 0.725
Exon 19 ARMS-PCR 2908 757 20.7 11.21 0.001
NGS 678 124 15.5
Exon 20 ARMS-PCR 3551 114 3.1 25.384 0.000
NGS 747 55 6.9
Exon 21 ARMS-PCR 2760 905 24.7 5.403 0.020
NGS 635 167 39.4
Multiple locus mutations ARMS-PCR 90 2.7 269.319 0.000
NGS 131 16.3
Total ARMS-PCR 1921 1744 47.6 7.125 0.008
NGS 462 340 42.4

Comparison of mutation rates of exon-related mutation sites detected by the two methods. The mutation rates were compared by row X list Chi-square test, and P