Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;31(1):303–315. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02905-2

Table 3.

abcd Intercorrelation of the measurements for t1, t2, differences (Δ) and t2 + Δ

(a) Spearman correlations (rho) for t1; n = 395
t1 FTF-CROM EQ-VAS EQ5D TTO NPRS HAQ ODI
FTF-CROM
EQ5D health (EQ-VAS) 0.16**
EQ5D TTO 0.19** 0.39**
NPRS 0.18** 0.36** −0.58**
HAQ 0.30** 0.37** −0.66** 0.44**
ODI 0.22** 0.43** −0.68** 0.58** 0.69**
Mean PROMs 0.27** 0.64** 0.83** 0.77** 0.77** 0.85**
Overall MQO 0.86** 0.44** 0.55** 0.52** 0.62** 0.59**
Linear regression with constant (beta coefficients) for t1 scores (predictor FTF t1; R2 = 0.098; p = 0.000***; c = 18.371): −0.073*EQ-VAS t1 + −0.029*EQ5D TTO t1 + 0.074*NPRS t1 + 0.252*HAQ t1 + −0.036*ODI t1
(b) Spearman correlations (rho) for t2; n = 395
t2 FTF-CROM EQ-VAS EQ5D TTO NPRS HAQ ODI
FTF-CROM
EQ5D health (EQ-VAS) −0.17**
EQ5D TTO −0.29** 0.45**
NPRS 0.21** −0.42** −0.67**
HAQ 0.36** −0.41** −0.73** 0.55**
ODI 0.27** −0.46** −0.77** 0.64** 0.73**
Mean PROMs 0.32** 0.73** 0.84** 0.80** 0.80** 0.85**
Overall MQO 0.84** 0.53** 0.65** 0.57** 0.68** 0.65**
Linear regression with constant (beta coefficients) for t2 scores (predictor FTF t2; R2 = 0.139; p = 0.000***; c = 16.653): −0.029*EQ-VAS t2 + −0.082*EQ5D TTO t2 + 0.022*NPRS t2 + 0.254*HAQ t2 + 0.037*ODI t2
(c) Spearman correlations (rho) for differences (t2 − t1; Δ); n = 395
Difference; Δ (D = t2 − t1) FTF-CROM EQ-VAS EQ5D TTO NPRS HAQ ODI
FTF-CROM
EQ5D health (EQ-VAS) 0.01
EQ5D TTO 0.02 0.11*
NPRS 0.05 −0.12* −0.38**
HAQ −0.00 −0.08 −0.34** 0.24**
ODI 0.02 −0.17** −0.40** 0.37** 0.34**
Mean PROMs 0.05 0.54** 0.67** 0.66** 0.49** 0.62**
Overall MQO 0.60** 0.42** 0.49** 0.55** 0.36** 0.49**
Linear regression with constant (beta coefficients) for difference scores (predictor FTF difference; R2 = 0.003; p = 0.964; c = −4.528): −0.006*EQ-VAS D + 0.026 EQ5D TTO D + 0.023*NPRS D + 0.006*HAQ D + 0.037*ODI D
(d) Spearman correlations (rho) for performance score (t2 + Δ; t2D); n = 395
Performance scores FTF-CROM EQ-VAS EQ5D TTO NPRS HAQ ODI
FTF-CROM
EQ5D health (EQ-VAS) −0.11*
EQ5D TTO −0.15** 0.22**
NPRS 0.13** −0.26** −0.48**
HAQ 0.28** −0.26** −0.36** 0.40**
ODI 0.23** −0.33** −0.50** 0.53** 0.24**
Mean PROMs 0.23** 0.68** 0.64** 0.73** 0.63** 0.75**
Overall MQO 0.74** 0.52** 0.51** 0.56** 0.56** 0.63**
Linear regression with constant (beta co + B2:H48ficients) for perf. scores (predictor FTF t2D; R2 = 0.093; p = 0.000***; c = 7.709): 0.001*EQ-VAS t2D + −0.028*EQ5D TTO t2D + −0.020*NPRS t2D + 0.191*HAQ t2D + 0.140*ODI t2D

CROM-FTF, mean of PROMs and the overall medical outcome (MQO; mean of PROMs and CROM-FTF) are highlighted in bold

Although the level of significant correlations (*, ** or bold) was reached for multiple measures (all p < 0.05*)—with the exception of the difference values—the Spearman’s rho of the FTF with the PROMs was very weak to weak (rho = 0.00–0.36). A rho = 0.10 corresponds to a small effect, rho of 0.30 correspond to a middle effect, and rho values > 0.50, to a large effect size [36]