Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;31(1):303–315. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02905-2

Table 4.

Consistency of performance scores between outcome measurements

Consistency (z-differences; classified within/between tertiles) CROM-FTF performance score (t2 + Δ) normalized with SD [z] Performance score ± SD [t2z + Δz, t2D] Diff. t2D (CROM − PROM)
High consistency (%) Moderate consistency (%) Discrepant (%) Mean SD
CROM-FTF t2 + Δ 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.50  ±  0.93 0.00  ±  0.00
Changes FTF (t2 – t1) 61.3 36.5 2.3 NaN  ±  NaN NaN  ±  NaN
Random variable t2 + Δ (0 ± √5) no consistency 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.00  ±  2.24 0.00  ±  3.16
EQ5D health (EQ-VAS) t2 + Δ 59.2 27.3 13.4 0.40  ±  1.93 0.11  ±  2.10
EQ5D TTO t2 + Δ 72.9 22.3 4.8 0.50  ±  1.45 0.00  ±  1.55
NPRS t2 + Δ 57.5 34.7 7.8 0.78  ±  1.56 0.27  ±  1.70
HAQ t2 + Δ 76.7 18.2 5.1 0.22  ±  1.34 0.29  ±  1.39
ODI t2 + Δ 71.4 24.8 3.8 0.51  ±  1.32 0.00  ±  1.40
Mean PROMs t2 + Δ 68.9 27.3 3.8 −0.62  ±  1.34 0.11  ±  1.42

CROM-FTF, mean of PROMs and the overall medical outcome (MQO; mean of PROMs and CROM-FTF) are highlighted in bold

Consistency. In most cases (68.9%), the results in CROM-FTF and PROMs point in the same direction (high consistency). Specifically, 27.3% of results in PROM scores showed a moderate agreement in performance with CROM-FTF (moderate consistency). In 3.8% of the cases, the results between CROM-FTF vs PROMs were contrary to each other (discrepant)

Consistency of performance (t2 + Δ; Differences of t2D/√10) using normal scores in three categories: (high consistency = t2D within one/same tertile. moderate consistency = between one and two tertiles. discrepant = more than two tertiles difference in normalized performance scores); n = 395