Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 20;30(1):260–269. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06493-z

Table 6.

Comparison of the correlation coefficients of connectivity with arthrometric data

Connectivity NO134 NO160 NO200 ACLR134 ACLR160 ACLR200
TC − 0.716 − 0.6996 − 0.7201 − 0.0464 − 0.0063 0.0354
p = 0.020 p = 0.024 p = 0.019 (n.s.) (n.s.) (n.s.)
TT − 0.677 − 0.6522 − 0.6615 0.054 0.1004 0.1479
p = 0.032 p = 0.041 p = 0.037 (n.s.) (n.s.) (n.s.)
FC − 0.6665 − 0.6572 − 0.6511 − 0.1701 − 0.1285 − 0.0906
p = 0.035 p = 0.039 p = 0.041 (n.s.) (n.s.) (n.s.)
FT − 0.2627 − 0.2487 − 0.2767 0.3625 0.4115 0.4668
(n.s.) (n.s.) (n.s.) (n.s.) (n.s.) (n.s.)

TC tibial cortical bone, TT tibial trabecular bone, FC femoral cortical bone, FT femoral trabecular bone. NO—nonoperated knee joint; ACLR—knee joint after ACLR; 134, 160, and 200 are values of subsequent forces used during the test, expressed in [N]; n.s. no significance