Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2021 Jul 30;26(2):385–396. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03392-9

Table 2.

Durable Viral Load Suppression, a New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Sexual Health Clinic and Hospital Detoxification Patients, N = 99

TOTAL 12-Month Follow-Up Test Statistic p b 18-Month Follow-Up Test Statistic p b

Total with data at 12-month follow-up, n (%) Durably suppressed at 12-month follow-up, n (%) Total with data at18-month follow-up, n (%) Durably suppressed at 18-Month follow-up, n (%)

Total Sample 99 99 (100.00) 47 (47.47) Z=−0.90 .368 73 (73.74) 39 (53.42) Z=0.24 .808
Recruitment Location
 Sexual Health Clinic 36 36 (100.00) 26 (72.22) Z=2.43 .015 31 (86.11) 23 (74.19) Z=2.47 .013
 Detoxification Center 63 63 (100.00) 21 (33.33) Z=−2.97 .003 42 (66.67) 16 (38.10) Z=−1.80 .071
New Yorkers Newly Diagnosed with HIV, 2014–2017 c 8438 8438 (100.00) 4339 (51.42) Z=−1.07 .283 6803 (80.62) 3699 (54.37) Z=3.92 <.001
a

Durable viral suppression = two consecutive viral load tests at least 90 days apart, of ≤ 200 copies/mL, with no intervening unsuppressed viral load tests

b

P-value from One-Sample Proportion Test of Suppression Rate vs. 52%

c

Includes all new HIV diagnoses at a New York City provider from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2017 that were reported to the HIV Surveillance Registry and living in NYC at the time of diagnosis, excluding participants in the current study