Table 4.
Comparison of different strategies.
| Strategy | Total infectious individuals(TI) | Total averted infectious individuals (TA) | Infection averted ratio(IAR) | Objective function (J) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without control | 39377.1470 | - | - | 39377.1470 |
| Strategy A | 10259.6806 | 29117.4664 | 73.9451% | 11023.3541 |
| Strategy B | 7904.3330 | 31472.8140 | 79.9266% | 8703.9809 |
| Strategy C | 8720.8212 | 30656.3258 | 77.8531% | 9548.0656 |
| Strategy D | 7092.5969 | 32284.5501 | 81.9880% | 7983.1850 |
| Strategy E | 4344.2031 | 35032.9439 | 88.9677% | 5186.5590 |
| Strategy F | 3559.6179 | 35817.5291 | 90.9602% | 4588.0139 |
| Strategy G | 3329.9874 | 36047.1596 | 91.5434% | 4298.7053 |