Skip to main content
letter
. 2022 Jan 31;84(5):722–746. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.01.032

Table 1.

The basic information of the included literature.

Study Population Study type Country Intervention All person controls Vaccine efficacy(95%CI) Injection-site pain Adverse reactions
Walter et al.2 5–11years Randomized controlled trial United States BNT162b2 mRNA 2268 750 90.7% (95% CI, 67.7–98.3) 1093 /
Frenck et al.3 12–15years Randomized controlled trial United States BNT162b2 mRNA 2260 1129 100% (95% CI, 78.1 to 100) 939 /
Olson et al.4 12–18years Randomized controlled trial United States Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA.2doses 464 285 93% (95% CI = 83–97%) / /
Hause et al.5 12–17years observational study United States BNT162b2 mRNA 66,550 / / 41,927 46,585
Freedman et al.6 12–15years observational study Israel BNT162b2 mRNA 187,707 / 91.5% (95% CI 88.2–93.9% / /
Ali et al.7 12–17years Randomized controlled trial United States mRNA-1273 3732 1243 98.8(95%CI= 97.0 to 99.7) 2290 2140
Han et al.8 3–17 years Randomized controlled trial China CoronaVac 333 114 96•8% [95%CI= 93•1–98•8] 35 59
Zhu et al.9 6–17years Randomized controlled trial China Recombinant Adenovirus Type-5–Vectored Coronavirus 150 50 98.0% (95%CI= 93.0–99.5) 50 82
Xia et al.10 3–17years Randomized controlled trial China BBIBP-CorV 810 90 100% 53 229