Table 3.
Comparison of risk–prediction models with and without baseline LVEF for the composite of death or HHF under medical treatment.
| Base model* | Base model*+ LVEF (continuous) | Base model*+ LVEF (dichotomized by 55%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discrimination | |||
| C–statistic | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| IDI (95% CI) | Reference | 0.019 (0.001–0.051) P = 0.032 |
0.018 (0.001–0.044) P = 0.030 |
| NRI (95% CI) | Reference | 0.219 (0.066–0.343) P = 0.012 |
0.225 (0.104–0.333) P = 0.006 |
| Calibration | |||
| LR test | Reference | P <0.001 | P <0.001 |
| BIC | 1,366 | 1,358 | 1,359 |
BIC, Bayesian information criteria; CI, confidence interval; HHF, hospitalization for heart failure; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; LR, likelihood ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NRI, net reclassification improvement.
Base model adjusted for age, body mass index, atrial fibrillation, prior myocardial infarction, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, chronic kidney disease, New York Heart Association class III/IV, hemoglobin, left ventricular end–systolic diameter >50 mm, pulmonary hypertension, and EuroSCORE–II.