Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;118(2):413–423. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab032

Table 1.

Comparison of major coronary event rates across secondary prevention trials with statins vs. non-statins

Statin vs. placebo
High vs. low intensity statin
Statin/ ezetimibe vs. statin Statin/PCSK9 inhibitor vs. statin
4S CARE TNT IDEAL PROVE-IT IMPROVE-IT FOURIER ODYSSEY OUTCOMES
Follow-up period (year) 5.4 5.0 4.9 4.8 2.0 7.0 2.2 2.8
Mean LDL-C differencea (mg/dL) 65 38 24 21 33 17 56 46 d
Mean % LDL -C difference 35% 28% 24% 20% 35% 24% 59% 48%
Absolute reduction in major coronary eventsb (%) 10% 3% 1.6% 1.1% 1.1% 1.7% 1.0% c 1.1%
% difference in major coronary events 33% 24% 20% 11% 13% 8% 18% 12%
% reduction in CV event/40 mg/dL of LDL-C reduction 20% 25% 33% 21% 16% 19% 13% 10%
Average by category 23% (statin trials) 19% (ezetimibe trials) 12% (PCSK9 trials)
a

Measures difference in LDL between treatment and placebo arms at follow-up, NOT reduction at follow-up vs. baseline.

b

As directly reported by trial, or if not directly reported, calculated as sum of CHD death and non-fatal MI unless otherwise described.

c

Not directly reported. Calculated retrospectively as sum of (cardiovascular death—stroke death) + (total MI—fatal MI).

d

Averaged from reported values at 4, 12, and 48 months (LDL-C values at other time points not reported).