Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 29;23(1):e13479. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13479

TABLE 3.

Plan parameters achieved for scheduled and adapted plans for a representative prostate patient

Scheduled plan Adapted plan
Structure Goal Variation Reference plan Median (Hodges‐Lehmann) 95% CI Median (Hodges‐Lehmann) 95% CI Superior plan Statistical significance
CTVp D 98.0% ≥ 98.0% P: 1 D 98.0% ≥ 95.0% 97.5% 97.7% (97.3%–98.2%) 97.9% (97.6%–98.8%) Adapted Fail to reject H 0
CTVp D mean ≥ 100.0% P: 3 D mean ≥ 99.0% 101.2% 101.3% (100.9%–101.8%) 101.5% (101.3%–101.8%) Adapted Reject H 0
CTV_SV Prox D 98.0% ≥ 98.0% P: 1 D 98.0% ≥ 95.0% 99.4% 98.8% (97.9%–99.5%) 99.5% (98.5%–100.6%) Adapted Reject H 0
CTV_SV Distal D 98.0% ≥ 98.0% P: 1 D 98.0% ≥ 95.0% 118.9% 118.9% (117.6%–119.6%) 117.5% (115.6%–119.3%) Scheduled Reject H 0
PTV_60 D 98.0% ≥ 95.0% P: 1 D 98.0% ≥ 90.0% 95.8% 86.1% (82.8%–89%) 95.8% (94.7%–96.3%) Adapted Reject H 0
PTV_60 D 95.0% ≥ 98.0% P: 1 D 95.0% ≥ 95.0% 97.0% 91.9% (89.6%–93.9%) 97.0% (96.5%–97.6%) Adapted Reject H 0
PTV_60 D min 0.30 cm3 > 100.0% P: 3 D min 0.30 cm3 ≥ 60.0% 89.9% 74.0% (61.3%–78.4%) 87.8% (84.7%–89.7%) Adapted Reject H 0
PTV_60 D 1.0% ≤ 105.0% P: 4 D 1.0% ≤ 107.0% 103.0% 103.4% (103%–104%) 103.1% (102.9%–103.3%) Adapted Reject H 0
PTV_60 D max 0.30 cm3 ≤ 107.0% P: R D max 0.30 cm3 ≤ 110.0% 103.5% 104.1% (103.6%–104.7%) 103.7% (103.5%–103.9%) Adapted Reject H 0
PTV_50 D 98.0% ≥ 95.0% P: 2 D 98.0% ≥ 90.0% 114.1% 102.9% (99.3%–106.4%) 111.9% (109.4%–113.7%) Adapted Reject H 0
PTV_50 D 95.0% ≥ 100.0% P: 3 D 95.0% ≥ 95.0% 116.2% 109.9% (107.3%–112.2%) 115.8% (114.8%–116.5%) Adapted Reject H 0
Rectum V 57.00 Gy < 15.0% P: 2 V 57.00 Gy ≤ 16.0% 1.3% 0.6% (0.1%–2.2%) 1.0% (0.4%–2%) Scheduled Reject H 0
Rectum V 60.00 Gy < 3.0% P: 2 V 60.00 Gy ≤ 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% (0%–0.4%) 0.0% (0%–0%) Adapted  
Rectum V 28.00 Gy ≤ 58.0% P: 2 V 28.00 Gy ≤ 60.0% 31.9% 33.3% (28.6%–37.3%) 32.6% (29.1%–34.5%) Adapted Fail to reject H 0
Rectum V 18.00 Gy ≤ 60.0% P: 2 V 18.00 Gy ≤ 65.0% 56.3% 62.5% (57.3%–66.3%) 55.9% (53.1%–57.1%) Adapted Reject H 0
Rectum V 52.80 Gy < 30.0% P: 3 V 52.80 Gy ≤ 30.0% 4.3% 2.9% (0.9%–5.1%) 4.4% (2.3%–5.7%) Scheduled Reject H 0
Rectum V 48.60 Gy < 50.0% P: 3 V 48.60 Gy ≤ 50.0% 7.3% 5.3% (2.3%–8.1%) 7.7% (5.2%–9.4%) Scheduled Reject H 0
Rectum V 40.80 Gy < 55.0% P: 3 V 40.80 Gy ≤ 60.0% 13.0% 11.0% (6.3%–14.3%) 13.7% (10.2%–15.8%) Scheduled Reject H 0
Bladder D 0.30 cm3 ≤ 60.00 Gy (3.00 Gy/Fx) P: 1 D 0.30 cm3 ≤ 61.00 Gy (3.05 Gy/Fx) 2.94 2.96 (2.94–3) 2.94 (2.94–2.98) Adapted Reject H 0
Bladder V 60.00 Gy ≤ 5.0% P: 3 V 60.00 Gy ≤ 7.0% 0.0% 0.0% (0%–0.1%) 0.0% (0%–0.1%) Adapted  
Bladder V 48.60 Gy ≤ 25.0% P: 3 V 48.60 Gy ≤ 30.0% 12.6% 10.3% (7.5%–13%) 12.6% (8.4%–17.6%) Scheduled Reject H 0
Bladder V 40.80 Gy ≤ 50.0% P: 3 V 40.80 Gy ≤ 60.0% 18.7% 16.3% (11.5%–21.5%) 17.9% (11.8%–24.4%) Scheduled Reject H 0
Penile bulb D 0.30 cm3 < 60.00 Gy (3.00 Gy/Fx) P: 1 D 0.30 cm3 ≤ 61.00 Gy (3.05 Gy/Fx) 2.95 2.95 (2.93–2.98) 2.93 (2.91–2.94) Adapted Reject H 0
Penile bulb D mean ≤ 48.00 Gy (2.40 Gy/Fx) P: 3 D mean ≤ 52.50 Gy (2.63 Gy/Fx) 2.20 1.77 (1.49–1.99) 1.88 (1.55–2.22) Scheduled Fail to reject H 0
Femur head right D 0.30 cm3 < 50.00 Gy (2.50 Gy/Fx) P: 3 D 0.30 cm3 ≤ 52.00 Gy (2.60 Gy/Fx) 1.23 1.33 (1.28–1.37) 1.43 (1.32–1.52) Scheduled Reject H 0
Femur head left D 0.30 cm3 < 50.00 Gy (2.50 Gy/Fx) P: 3 D 0.30 cm3 ≤ 52.00 Gy (2.60 Gy/Fx) 1.65 1.56 (1.53–1.6) 1.50 (1.39–1.56) Adapted Reject H 0
Sigmoid colon D 0.30 cm3 < 59.00 Gy (2.95 Gy/Fx) P: 1 D 0.30 cm3 ≤ 60.00 Gy (3.00 Gy/Fx) 1.36 1.93 (1.5–2.33) 1.49 (1.25–2.12) Adapted Reject H 0
Sigmoid colon V 48.60 Gy < 50.0% P: 3 V 48.60 Gy ≤ 51.0% 0.0% 0.2% (0%–0.9%) 0.0% (0%–1.3%) Adapted Fail to reject H 0
Sigmoid colon V 40.80 Gy < 55.0% P: 3 V 40.80 Gy ≤ 60.0% 0.0% 1.0% (0%–2.7%) 0.1% (0%–3.4%) Adapted Reject H 0

Note: Statistical significance is determined using a Wilcoxon‐signed rank test, the Hodges–Lehmann median is displayed, and Walsh averages were used to determine 95% confidence intervals.