Table 1.
Total | High (positive) expression | Low (negative) expression | p value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hu HG 2012(COH) (10) | Distant metastasis | 0.911 | |||
Yes | 42 | 12 | 30 | ||
No | 180 | 53 | 127 | ||
| |||||
Hu HG 2012(ZJU) (10) | Distant metastasis | 0.01 | |||
Yes | 40 | 10 | 30 | ||
No | 372 | 172 | 200 | ||
| |||||
Wang XY 2014 (11) | Distant metastasis | 0.039 | |||
Yes | 28 | 5 | 23 | ||
No | 76 | 30 | 46 | ||
| |||||
Hu HG 2012(COH) (10) | Lymph node metastasis | 0.322 | |||
Yes | 55 | 19 | 36 | ||
No | 167 | 46 | 121 | ||
| |||||
Hu HG 2012(ZJU) (10) | Lymph node metastasis | 0.049 | |||
Yes | 183 | 71 | 112 | ||
No | 229 | 111 | 118 | ||
| |||||
Wang XY 2014 (11) | Lymph node metastasis | 0.022 | |||
Yes | 69 | 18 | 51 | ||
No | 35 | 17 | 18 | ||
| |||||
Han W 2018 (12) | Duke stage | 0.421 | |||
A + B | 44 | 19 | 25 | ||
C + D | 35 | 12 | 23 | ||
| |||||
Zhang H 2011 (13) | Duke stage | 0.032 | |||
A + B | 87 | 75 | 12 | ||
C + D | 77 | 56 | 21 | ||
| |||||
Wang XY 2014 (11) | Duke stage | 0.022 | |||
A + B | 35 | 17 | 18 | ||
C + D | 69 | 18 | 51 | ||
| |||||
Hu HG 2012(COH) (10) | Differentiation | 0.852 | |||
High | 19 | 6 | 13 | ||
Low | 193 | 57 | 136 | ||
| |||||
Hu HG 2012(ZJU) (10) | Differentiation | 0.001 | |||
High | 159 | 86 | 73 | ||
Low | 253 | 96 | 157 | ||
| |||||
Wang XY 2014 (11) | Differentiation | 0.536 | |||
High | 12 | 5 | 7 | ||
Low | 91 | 30 | 61 | ||
| |||||
Han W 2018 (12) | Differentiation | 0.238 | |||
High | 13 | 7 | 6 | ||
Low | 66 | 24 | 42 | ||
| |||||
Zhang H 2011 (13) | Differentiation | 0.012 | |||
High | 114 | 97 | 17 | ||
Low | 50 | 34 | 16 |