TABLE 2.
Reference | Age and BMI of subject group (n) | Study design | Energy, kcal | Meal composition | Amount of fat source | Fat source/meal pattern | FA composition | Blood collection, h | Results2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Austin et al. (30) | 54 y, 26 ± 1 kg/m2 (n = 15) | Crossover, double-blind | 667 | 34 g fat, 17 g protein, 71 g CHO | 0 g | Control (tallow for coconut oil; olive oil for fish oil) | 15 g SFA, 15 g MUFA, 2 g PUFA3 | 0, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 | AUC0-5h control > fish oil and fish oil and coconut oil (P = 0.0125 and P = 0.0186) |
667 | 34 g fat, 17 g protein, 71 g CHO | 6 g | Fish oil | 15 g SFA, 11 g MUFA, 6 g PUFA3 | |||||
667 | 34 g fat, 17 g protein, 71 g CHO | 19 g | Extra virgin coconut oil | 23 g SFA, 7 g MUFA, 1 g PUFA3 | iAUC0-5h coconut oil > fish oil and coconut oil (P = 0.0480) | ||||
667 | 34 g fat, 17 g protein, 71 g CHO | 6 g, 19 g | Fish oil, Extra virgin coconut oil | 22 g SFA, 3 g MUFA, 6 g PUFA3 | |||||
Bellido et al. (36) | Age and BMI not stated (n = 8) | Crossover, 4 wk of Western diet before study | 50–66% of daily intake | 60 EN% fat, 15 EN% protein, 25 EN% CHO | 1 g/kg body mass | Butter | 35 EN% SFA, 22 EN% MUFA, 4 EN% PUFA3 | 0, 3, 6, 9 | No calculation of AUC of postprandial TG concentration. No significant difference in alternative parameter |
Olive oil | 22 EN% SFA, 38 EN% MUFA, 4 EN% PUFA3 | ||||||||
Walnuts | 20 EN% SFA, 24 EN% MUFA, 16 EN% PUFA3 | ||||||||
Meikle et al. (37) | 53 ± 5 y, 30 ± 6 kg/m2 (n = 16) | Crossover | 745 | 54 g fat, 29 g protein, 37 g CHO | Not stated | Dairy products | 67 g SFA, 23 g MUFA, 5 g PUFA4 | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 | No calculation of AUC of postprandial TG concentration. No significant difference in alternative parameter |
786 | 54 g fat, 29 g protein, 47 g CHO | Soy products | 37 g SFA, 40 g MUFA, 24 g PUFA4 | ||||||
Mekki et al. (24) | 20–29 y, 22 ± 1 kg/m2 (n = 10) | Crossover | Not stated | Not stated | 0 g | No fat | Not stated | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 | iAUC0-7h butter < other meals (P < 0.05) |
40 g | Butter | 54 g/100 g SFA: 14 g/100 g C4:0–C12:0, 11 g/100 g C14:0, 30 g/100 g C16:0, 11 g/100 g C18:0, 25 g/100 g C18:14 | |||||||
Olive oil | 11 g/100 g C16:0, 76 g/100 g C18:1, 9 g/100 g C18:24 | ||||||||
Sunflower oil | 21 g/100 g C18:1, 67 g/100 g C18:24 | ||||||||
Pedersen et al. (38) | 24 y, 23 kg/m2 (n = 12) | Crossover, double-blind | Breakfast, 358 | 17 g fat, 9 g protein, 43 g CHO | 15 g | Palm oil | 39% SFA, 47% MUFA, 14% PUFA4 | Every 15 min for 1.5 h after breakfast, every 30 min for 2.5 h after lunch, hourly until 9 h postprandially | No calculation of AUC of postprandial TG concentration. No significant difference in alternative parameter |
Lunch, 1337 | 64 g fat, 32 g protein, 153 g CHO | 55 g | Canola oil | 7% SFA, 63% MUFA, 30% PUFA4 | |||||
Sunflower oil | 11% SFA, 21% MUFA, 68% PUFA4 | ||||||||
Perez-Martinez et al. (40) | 22 ± 2 y, 25 ± 3 kg/m2 (n = 20) | Crossover, 4 wk of diet matching the FA composition of the postprandial protocol before study | 50–66% of daily intake | 60 EN% fat, 15 EN% protein, 25 EN% CHO | 1 g/kg body mass | Butter | 35 EN% SFA, 22 EN% MUFA, 4 EN% PUFA3 | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8.5, 11 | No calculation of AUC of postprandial TG concentration. Olive oil: greater TG concentration in early postprandial phase and earlier decrease to preprandial TG concentration (P = 0.002 and P = 0.012) |
Olive oil | 20 EN% SFA, 36 EN% MUFA, 4 EN% PUFA3 | ||||||||
Walnuts | 20 EN% SFA, 24 EN% MUFA, 16 EN% PUFA3 | ||||||||
Sanders et al. (27) | 23 ± 4 y, 23 ± 3 kg/m2 (n = 9)5 | Crossover, 3 wk of diet matching the FA composition of the postprandial protocol before study | 1846 | 79 g fat, 54 g protein, 238 g CHO | Not stated | Butter | 46 wt% SFA, 33 wt% MUFA, 12 wt% PUFA4 | 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 | No significant difference |
Olive oil | 22 wt% SFA, 55 wt% MUFA, 18 wt% PUFA4 | ||||||||
Olive oil and fish oil | 20 wt% SFA, 52 wt% MUFA, 19 wt% PUFA4 | ||||||||
Sciarillo et al. (32) | 24 ± 1 y, 26 ± 7 kg/m2 (n = 10) | Crossover | 13 kcal/kg body mass (mean 995 kcal) | 61 EN% fat, 7 EN% protein, 32 EN% CHO | Individual (mean 65 g) | Unsalted butter | Not stated | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | No significant difference |
Native coconut oil | |||||||||
Native olive oil extra | |||||||||
Canola oil | |||||||||
Sun et al. (28) | 27 ± 6 y, 23 ± 3 kg/m2 (n = 20) | Crossover, single-blind | Not stated | Not stated | 48 g (40 g fat) | Unsalted butter | 24 g SFA, 8 g MUFA, 8 g PUFA3 | 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 | iAUC0-4h butter < olive oil (P < 0.01) |
44 g (40 g fat) | Refined olive oil | 6 g SFA, 31 g MUFA, 3 g PUFA3 | |||||||
40 g | Refined grape seed oil | 4 g SFA, 8 g MUFA, 28 g PUFA3 | |||||||
Svensson et al. (29) | 34 ± 8 y, 23 ± 3 kg/m2 (n = 19) | Crossover, single-blind | 786 | 47 g fat, 23 g protein, 69 g CHO | 42 g (35 g fat) | Butter | 75 mol% SFA (C4:0–C18:0), 20 mol% MUFA, 2 mol% PUFA4 | 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 | No significant difference |
35 g | Native olive oil | 15 mol% SFA (C4:0–C18:0), 69 mol% MUFA, 16 mol% PUFA4 | |||||||
35 g | Linseed oil and canola oil | 7 mol% SFA (C4:0–C18:0), 39 mol% MUFA, 55 mol% PUFA4 | |||||||
Tholstrup et al. (39) | 38 ± 11 y, 21 ± 1 kg/m2 (n = 10) | Crossover, single-blind | 621 kcal/100 g | 76 EN% fat, 3 EN% protein, 21 EN% CHO | 1 g/kg body mass (mean 62 g) | Cocoa butter | 48 EN% SFA, 26 EN% MUFA, 2 EN% PUFA3 | 0, 4, 6 | No calculation of AUC of postprandial TG concentration. No significant difference in alternative parameter |
Olive oil | 12 EN% SFA, 57 EN% MUFA, 8 EN% PUFA3 | ||||||||
Thomsen et al. (26) | 23 ± 2 y, 21 ± 2 kg/m2 (n = 10) | Crossover, single-blind | Not stated | Not stated | 0 g | No fat | Not stated | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 | No significant difference |
100 g | Butter | 72% SFA4 | |||||||
80 g | Olive oil | 74% MUFA4 |
Age and BMI are given as mean ± SD. Numbers are rounded to whole numbers. CHO, carbohydrate; EN%, energy percentage; FA, fatty acid; iAUC, incremental AUC; wt%, weight percentage.
Referring to comparisons between AUC of postprandial TG concentration (plasma, serum, capillary blood) after SFA-rich meals and meals rich in unsaturated FAs.
Referring to the content of SFA, MUFA, and PUFA in the meal.
Referring to the content of SFA, MUFA, and PUFA in the fat source.
Age and BMI referring to all 26 study participants.