Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;26(1):100390. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100390

Table 3.

Correlation between PFM pressure and average temperature of the PF area.

n Manometry (cmH2O) PF temperature (°C) Correlation p value
Very weak 9 9.5 ± 2.7 34.9 ± 0.7 0.7 0.001*
Weak 53 19.3 ± 2.8 35.6 ± 0.8
Moderate 154 34.5 ± 3.2 36.7 ± 0.5
Good 12 53.7 ± 5.6 37.5 ± 0.1
Strong 3 63.2 ± 1.4 37.6 ± 0.0

Results in mean ± standard deviation; n, number of participants; manometry, PFM pressure recorded by the manometer; ºC, PF average temperature in degree Celsius; PFM, pelvic floor muscles; PF, pelvic floor.

Significant by Pearson's correlation.