Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 2021 Dec 22;41(3):e109728. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021109728

Helical ordering of envelope‐associated proteins and glycoproteins in respiratory syncytial virus

Michaela J Conley 1, Judith M Short 2, Andrew M Burns 1, James Streetley 1, Joshua Hutchings 3,6, Saskia E Bakker 1,7, B Joanne Power 1,8, Hussain Jaffery 1, Joanne Haney 1, Giulia Zanetti 3, Pablo R Murcia 1, Murray Stewart 2, Rachel Fearns 4,5, Swetha Vijayakrishnan 1,, David Bhella 1,
PMCID: PMC8804925  PMID: 34935163

Abstract

Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes severe respiratory illness in children and the elderly. Here, using cryogenic electron microscopy and tomography combined with computational image analysis and three‐dimensional reconstruction, we show that there is extensive helical ordering of the envelope‐associated proteins and glycoproteins of RSV filamentous virions. We calculated a 16 Å resolution sub‐tomogram average of the matrix protein (M) layer that forms an endoskeleton below the viral envelope. These data define a helical lattice of M‐dimers, showing how M is oriented relative to the viral envelope. Glycoproteins that stud the viral envelope were also found to be helically ordered, a property that was coordinated by the M‐layer. Furthermore, envelope glycoproteins clustered in pairs, a feature that may have implications for the conformation of fusion (F) glycoprotein epitopes that are the principal target for vaccine and monoclonal antibody development. We also report the presence, in authentic virus infections, of N‐RNA rings packaged within RSV virions. These data provide molecular insight into the organisation of the virion and the mechanism of its assembly.

Keywords: cryo‐EM, cryo‐ET, glycoprotein, matrix protein, virus structure

Subject Categories: Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction; Structural Biology


CryoEM and tomography analysis of the human pathogen RSV shows the formation of filamentous virions that exhibit helical ordering of the envelope associated matrix protein layer that in turn coordinates helical ordering and clustering of viral glycoproteins.

graphic file with name EMBJ-41-e109728-g012.jpg

Introduction

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes acute lower respiratory tract disease in infants and the elderly. It is estimated that there are approximately 33 million RSV infections annually in children under the age of five years, leading to around 3 million hospital admissions and 60,000 in‐hospital deaths. The great majority of these cases (~ 30 million) occur in low‐ and middle‐income countries (Shi et al, 2017). Although less common than seasonal influenza virus infection, RSV has been shown to be associated with higher mortality rates in hospitalised elderly patients (Kwon et al, 2017; Ackerson et al, 2019).

Respiratory syncytial virus is formally classified as human orthopneumovirus within the Orthopneumovirus genus, Pneumovirus family and Mononegavirales order (Rima et al, 2017). Closely related to RSV within the Pneumoviridae, in the Metapneumovirus genus is another notable pathogen, human metapneumovirus (HMPV) that also causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia in infants (van den Hoogen et al, 2001). Thus, both ortho‐ and metapneumoviruses are clinically important respiratory pathogens.

Respiratory syncytial virus is a non‐segmented negative‐sense RNA containing enveloped virus. The viral genome is 15.2 kb and has ten open reading frames encoding at least eleven gene products. The viral RNA is encapsidated by multiple copies of the viral encoded nucleocapsid protein (N) to form a left‐handed helical ribonucleoprotein complex (or nucleocapsid—NC) (Tawar et al, 2009; Bakker et al, 2013; Liljeroos et al, 2013). This serves as the template for RNA synthesis by the RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (Mazumder & Barik, 1994), thought to occur in virus induced cytoplasmic organelles called inclusion bodies (Norrby et al, 1970; Rincheval et al, 2017; Galloux et al, 2020). The RdRp comprises two proteins: the catalytic large (L) protein and the phosphoprotein (P) that mediates the interaction with the NC (Garcia‐Barreno et al, 1996; Murphy et al, 2003; Castagne et al, 2004; Tran et al, 2007; Galloux et al, 2012; Ouizougun‐Oubari et al, 2015; Gilman et al, 2019). RNA synthesis is also modulated by the M2 gene products M2‐1 and M2‐2 (Bermingham & Collins, 1999; Fearns & Collins, 1999). M2‐1 is an anti‐termination factor that is recruited to the polymerase complex via an interaction with P, leading to increased production of viral mRNA (Collins et al, 1995; Hardy & Wertz, 1998; Mason et al, 2003).

Respiratory syncytial virus encodes four envelope‐associated proteins, of which three are membrane proteins: the small hydrophobic protein (SH), fusion protein (F), and attachment protein (G). Underlying the envelope is the fourth envelope‐associated protein—the matrix protein (M), which coordinates virion assembly. A second layer of density, visualised by cryo‐ET, beneath the M‐layer is postulated to be M2‐1 (Liljeroos et al, 2013; Kiss et al, 2014). High‐resolution structures for some of the envelope‐associated proteins of both RSV and HMPV have been determined by X‐ray crystallography, including the matrix proteins (Money et al, 2009; Leyrat et al, 2014b; Forster et al, 2015) and F glycoprotein (McLellan et al, 2011, 2013) as well as M2‐1 (Leyrat et al, 2014a; Tanner et al, 2014; Selvaraj et al, 2018).

At present, 39 vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting RSV are in development, the vast majority of which are directed at two conformations of the RSV F glycoprotein: pre‐fusion and post‐fusion, and their most neutralisation‐sensitive antigenic sites, Ø and V (Mejias et al, 2020). The RSV pre‐fusion conformation of the F glycoprotein is the predominant form displayed at the virion surface and mediates viral entry by fusing viral and host cell membranes. The shapes of enveloped virions and the organisation of their surface glycoproteins can impact virus biology by affecting fusion processes (Li et al, 2021), mucus penetration (Vahey & Fletcher, 2019) and complement activation (preprint: Kuppan et al, 2021). A comprehensive understanding of RSV virion structure will therefore inform development of effective interventions to prevent RSV disease. Although the structures of RSV proteins and glycoproteins are becoming increasingly well understood, placing these structures in the context of the virion remains challenging, owing to the highly pleomorphic nature of virus particles purified from cell culture (Liljeroos et al, 2013; Kiss et al, 2014). Schematic diagrams mostly represent the RSV virion as a spherical particle, it has, however, long been known to form filamentous virions at the assembly site (Bachi & Howe, 1973). We have previously shown that propagating filamentous enveloped viruses in cells grown directly on TEM grids leads to improved preservation for imaging by cryo‐EM (Vijayakrishnan et al, 2013). Here, we employ this approach to image RSV filamentous virions by cryo‐EM and cryo‐ET. We show that although RSV virions are prone to loss of integrity, they are nonetheless highly ordered. Fourier analysis shows that filamentous particles exhibit helical ordering. Cryo‐ET combined with sub‐tomogram averaging led to the calculation of a three‐dimensional density map of the viral matrix layer at 16 Å resolution. Fitting the X‐ray structure of M shows a curved lattice of dimers that closely matches the arrangement seen in the (010) plane of the published X‐ray structure (i.e. the plane containing the a and c axes of the C2 unit cell). Our model orients the X‐ray data relative to the virion filament axis and the viral envelope, providing a view of how M coordinates virion assembly. Our data also show that the matrix layer coordinates helical ordering of the viral glycoprotein spikes on the virion exterior. Finally, we show that glycoprotein spikes cluster in pairs on filamentous virions but can also pack in an alternate lattice in non‐filamentous virions. Our data also demonstrate the presence of an abundance of ring‐shaped assemblies, likely formed of N and RNA. Our findings concerning the structure of RSV provide a molecular understanding of virion organisation and assembly, information that is critically important in the development of effective vaccines or interventions to prevent or treat this major respiratory pathogen.

Results

Cryo‐EM of filamentous RSV virions reveals helical order

To image RSV filamentous virions in as close to native conditions as possible, we propagated virus in cells cultured directly on holey carbon support films. Over the course of our investigations, several cell types were used—Vero (African green monkey kidney cells), U2 OS (human osteosarcoma cells) and A549 (human adenocarcinoma cells). All were found to be suited to imaging filamentous virions. Measurements taken from cryo‐EM images of virions produced in U2‐OS and A549 cells indicated that both cell‐lines produced filaments that had a similar range of diameters. Imaging of filaments was optimal at 72 h post‐infection (Fig 1A). RSV‐infected U2‐OS cells propagated on cryo‐EM grids were prepared by plunge‐freezing at this timepoint for imaging in a Thermo Fisher Titan Krios 300 keV cryomicroscope, equipped with a Falcon II detector. Power spectra calculated from cropped sections of filamentous virion images indicated a high degree of helical order evidenced by the presence of multiple layer lines (Fig 1B and C). The diameters of filaments extracted from these images varied considerably and spanned a range of 800–1,800 Å. Indexing of the transforms using the program PyHI (Zhang, 2021) suggested that the Bessel orders of the two principal maxima were very large, consistent with the tubes being constructed of many helical strands, probably of the order of 50. There was no density for the principal maximum for one of the vectors defining the helical lattice, and it was nonetheless able to be established by using higher order reflections. A one‐sided filtered image (Fig 1D) showed clear helical tracks and strong features lining the interior of the viral envelope, supporting our interpretation that layer lines observed in the Fourier transform are indicative of helical ordering, most likely in the matrix layer. The relatively weak intensity of the transforms, the large radii of the principal maxima along with the considerable variation in filament diameters, frustrated the production of reliable 3‐dimensional reconstructions using either Fourier‐Bessel or iterative real‐space methods. This led us to explore whether cryo‐ET could provide a structure of the underlying lattice.

Figure 1. Respiratory syncytial virus forms filamentous virions that exhibit a high degree of helical order.

Figure 1

  1. Immunofluorescence imaging of vero cells infected with RSV at 72 h post‐infection shows an abundance of filamentous particles. Virus particles were identified by labelling with an antibody that targeted the nucleocapsid protein (green). Phalloidin was used to localise actin (red), and DAPI reagent was used to stain cell nuclei (blue).
  2. Cryo‐EM image of a short section of RSV filament.
  3. The power‐spectrum for the filament shown in (B) is shown, Fourier‐Bessel analysis was used to identify a putative helical lattice, the positions of principal maxima are indicated by boxes, and however, one was found to be missing (green box). The lattice was only able to be identified using higher‐order reflections.
  4. Masking and Fourier synthesis led to the reconstitution of a one‐sided, filtered image, showing the presence of helical tracks and strong density lining the inner leaflet of the viral envelope (inset).

Cryo‐ET of RSV filamentous virions

To resolve the helical lattices underpinning RSV virion structure and assembly and to provide a detailed three‐dimensional (3D) view of virion morphology, we used cryogenic electron tomography to calculate 3D reconstructions of RSV filamentous virions produced by A549 cells grown on cryo‐EM support grids. Fifty‐eight tilt‐series were recorded on a Thermo Fisher Titan Krios 300 keV cryomicroscope equipped with a Gatan K2 bioquantum energy‐filtered direct electron detector. Tilt‐series of images were collected specifically targeting straight, undisrupted segments of filamentous virions. Low‐magnification views of regions selected showed that although filamentous structure was well preserved by culturing virus on the TEM grid (Fig 2A), many virions were to some extent disrupted, frequently having varicosities at points along their length or at one end. These data confirm that RSV virions are very fragile and easily lose their filamentous shape (Fig 2B and C).

Figure 2. Cryoelectron tomography of RSV filaments reveals a complex envelope.

Figure 2

  • A
    Propagating RSV directly on the TEM grid led to improved preservation of filamentous morphology.
  • B, C
    Despite the gentle preparation methods, many virions showed signs of disruption such as varicosities. The areas indicated by purple boxes were imaged to collect tilt‐series. The filament in panel (A) is shown in Fig 3A, the filament in panel (B) is shown in Fig 2G, and the filament shown in panel (C) is shown in Fig 3B.
  • D, E
    (D) A central slice through a denoised tomogram shows a complex viral envelope, shown at higher magnification in (E). Glycoprotein spikes are densely packed, giving a picket‐fence like appearance when viewed from the side (highlighted in mauve). The lipid bilayer is highlighted in pale blue, the matrix layer in orange, and the less well‐ordered protein layer previously hypothesised to consist of M2‐1 is shaded in dark blue.
  • F
    Tilt‐series were collected targeting straight regions of filamentous virions; however, some tomograms captured the virion ends, which were found to be hemispherical but rather flattened. In some cases (as shown here), the matrix layer was intact and contiguous at the filament ends (blue arrows), while some virions showed an absence of M.
  • G
    Loss of virion integrity was accompanied by discontinuities in the matrix layer (green arrows).

A complex, ordered viral envelope

Tomographic reconstruction of filament sections reveals that virions are well‐ordered. As previously reported (Liljeroos et al, 2013; Kiss et al, 2014; Ke et al, 2018), we find that the viral envelope is densely packed with viral glycoprotein spikes. Underlying the lipid bilayer is a contiguous density that we attribute to the matrix protein (M). This gives the viral envelope the appearance of being triple layered (Fig 2D and E, Movie EV1 timepoint 0m 25s). Beneath the M‐layer is a second less sharply defined protein layer that has previously been postulated to be M2‐1 (Kiss et al, 2014). Filament ends were typically hemispherical having a large radius of curvature, lending the caps a flattened appearance. Most tomograms of virion ends showed a contiguous matrix layer (Fig 2F), although some were seen to have disrupted or missing matrix layers. Discontinuity in the matrix layer was more apparent in the varicose areas, indicating that loss of virion integrity is likely a consequence of detachment or mis‐assembly of the matrix layer (Fig 2G).

Nucleocapsids appear as classical herringbone assemblies, loosely coiled helices and rings

The virion interior is densely packed with viral nucleocapsids, mainly having the characteristic herringbone morphology (Bhella et al, 2002) and suggesting that in common with several other mononegavirales, RSV virions are polyploid (Loney et al, 2009) (Fig 3A, Movie EV1). Virions were also seen to be filled with an abundance of ring‐like assemblies that ranged in diameter from 10 to 17 nm (Fig 3B). Upon close inspection of these structures, we found several rings that had radial spikes and closely resembled decameric and undecameric rings produced by heterologous expression of the RSV N protein in insect cells or bacteria (Bhella et al, 2002; Maclellan et al, 2007; Tran et al, 2007; Tawar et al, 2009) (Fig 3C, Movie EV1 timepoint 1m 30s). In some cases, these ring‐like features appeared to precess, when moving through successive sections of tomograms, whereas in others there was no obvious continuity of density (Movie EV1 timepoint 2m 20s). We hypothesise then that some of these ring‐shaped assemblies are likely loosely coiled NC, but the absence of connecting density in successive tomogram sections and the presence of some isolated rings outside the virions (suspended in the vitreous ice layer—Movie EV1 timepoint 2m 05s) strongly suggest that many of these objects are N‐RNA rings. These assemblies may contain RNA products of aborted genome replication, although we cannot exclude the possibility that they may incorporate cellular RNAs.

Figure 3. RSV virions package helical nucleocapsids and an abundance of N‐RNA rings.

Figure 3

  1. Central slices through tomograms showed that virions contained helical nucleocapsids having the characteristic herringbone morphology (blue arrow).
  2. Many virions also contain large numbers of ring‐shaped assemblies.
  3. A close‐up view of these structures reveals the presence of radial spokes (pink arrows). These structures are morphologically very similar to previously described decameric and undecameric rings produced by recombinant expression of RSV N.

Helical ordering, clustering, and hexagonal arrays of glycoproteins

Previous studies have reported that RSV glycoprotein spikes are densely packed, giving a picket‐fence appearance when viewed from the side (e.g. Fig 2E) (Liljeroos et al, 2013; Kiss et al, 2014; Ke et al, 2018). A significant proportion of our tomograms showed helical ordering of glycoproteins, manifesting as striped arrays of density when viewed as slices taken through the glycoproteins at the top and bottom of virions (Fig 4A, Movie EV1 timepoint 2m 42s). Measurements of the spacings between the rows of glycoprotein spikes ranged between 89 and 208 Å, having both a mean and mode of 135 Å (SD = 20.6, n = 150). Some virions exhibited extensive and long‐range ordering of the glycoproteins. Interestingly, the glycoprotein spikes were often observed to cluster in pairs (Fig 4B). This was even more apparent in tomograms of virions that were only sparsely decorated with glycoproteins (Fig 4C–F). Centre to centre measurements of the spacing of paired glycoprotein spikes gave a mean distance of 84 Å (SD = 7.9, n = 100).

Figure 4. Helical ordering and clustering of RSV glycoprotein spikes.

Figure 4

  • A, B
    (A) A slice through the glycoprotein spikes of a filamentous RSV virion shows that they are helically ordered. Long‐range ordering of the glycoprotein spikes is evident, as is clustering of spikes in pairs (highlighted in (B)).
  • C–F
    In virions that are sparsely decorated with glycoprotein spikes, clustering in pairs is even more apparent.
  • G
    A central section through a tomogram of a pleomorphic RSV virion showing the presence of both herringbone nucleocapsids and N‐RNA rings (blue arrows), flattened, thicker membranes that likely have a matrix layer (green arrow), and tightly packed glycoprotein spikes (pink arrows).
  • H, I
    A section through the envelope region of the same particle shows the presence of a honeycomb‐like array of densities that may be an alternate arrangement of glycoprotein spikes, and discrete densities are seen (purple arrow) that are likely individual glycoprotein spikes.

A tomogram collected at the outset of this project on a JEOL 2200 FS cryomicroscope showed a large membranous structure, that might be interpreted as a pleomorphic virion or cell debris, produced by RSV‐infected Vero cells. This object showed angular, thicker regions of membrane, consistent with the presence of a matrix layer (as also seen in Fig 2B), picket‐fence like arrangement of glycoprotein spikes, and contained both nucleocapsid and ring‐shaped assemblies (Fig 4G—Movie EV1 timepoint 3m 22s). This object also had patches of density packed to form a honeycomb lattice (Fig 4H and I). The lattice appeared to be contiguous with the side‐views of the glycoprotein spikes (Movie EV1 timepoint 3m 37s) and in places individual densities consistent with single glycoprotein spikes could be seen. Considering the clustering of RSV glycoprotein spikes in pairs described above, we hypothesise that this array is an alternate arrangement of glycoproteins. While rarely imaged, we have also observed honeycomb packing of glycoproteins in a subsequent investigation of RSV virion morphology in the context of co‐infections (preprint: Haney et al, 2021), (Fig EV1). Making accurate measurements of the lattice was challenging as the densities were mostly not sharply resolved; nonetheless, by measuring distances between vertices of hexagons we estimated the mean spacing between glycoprotein spikes to be 74 Å (SD = 9.5, n = 50).

Figure EV1. Honeycomb lattice observed in RSV particles produced in a co‐infection study.

Figure EV1

  • A, B
    Tomograms of a pleomorphic particle show extensive patches of glycoprotein arrays with hexagonal packing. Slices are shown at different z values through the same particle.

Sub‐tomogram averaging of RSV envelope components—packing of matrix proteins

To better understand the way the RSV matrix protein drives virion assembly, we sought to calculate a three‐dimensional reconstruction of the matrix layer by sub‐tomogram averaging. Tiles of the viral envelope were extracted and aligned using Dynamo (Castano‐Diez et al, 2012), yielding a 3D reconstruction of the matrix layer at 16 Å resolution (Fig EV2). Viewed from the virion interior, the reconstruction reveals a regular array of M proteins (Fig 5A–C, Movie EV2 timepoint 0m 7s). Viewed from the virion exterior the reconstruction has weak stripes of density that are visible at lower isosurface threshold levels (Fig 5D–F, Movie EV2 timepoint 0m 32s). This feature is likely incoherent averaging of the viral glycoprotein spikes.

Figure EV2. Resolution measurement for the sub‐tomogram average of the RSV viral envelope.

Figure EV2

Fourier shell correlation analysis showed that sub‐tomogram averaging, focussed on the matrix array, achieved a resolution of 16 Å. Resolution assessment used a cut‐off of 0.5, as the gold‐standard protocol was not used during sub‐tomogram alignment.

Figure 5. Sub‐tomogram averaging of the RSV viral envelope reveals the structure of the matrix layer.

Figure 5

  1. Viewed from the filament interior, a regular array of density is seen in the envelope layer attributed to the matrix protein.
  2. The average is tilted 45° towards the viewer.
  3. The average is tilted a further 45°, giving a view of the lipid bilayer. The inner leaflet of the bilayer is only weakly resolved compared to the outer leaflet.
  4. Viewed from the virion exterior at a lower isosurface threshold, stripes of weak, noisy density are seen. This is likely incoherent averaging of glycoprotein spike density.
  5. Tilting the reconstruction towards the viewer by 45° shows that the inner leaflet contacts the M‐layer.
  6. A fourth density layer is now visible, under the matrix. This density has been previously attributed to the RNA polymerase co‐factor M2‐1. Like the glycoprotein density at the exterior of the envelope, the M2‐1 density is weak and incoherently averaged.

The X‐ray structure and solution studies of the RSV M protein showed that it assembles into dimers (Forster et al, 2015) (Fig 6A and B, Movie EV2 timepoint 0m 46s). Interestingly in that study, the M‐dimers in the C2 crystal lattice were stacked into sheets (Fig 6C, Movie EV2 timepoint 1m 10s). Docking the coordinates of the M‐dimer (PDB 4V23) into our map generated a curved array that closely resembled the arrangement seen in the (a,c) plane of the X‐ray structure (Fig 6D and E, Movie EV2 timepoint 1m 54s). A low‐pitch, right‐handed helix follows the (1,0,‐1) direction of the C2 unit cell of the X‐ray structure, which is the (1,1) direction in the P2 sheet (shown in Fig 6C). This had a spacing of 82 Å and an angle of 86.5° relative to the filament axis (Fig 6F). The a and c axes in the C2 X‐ray structure unit cell correspond to the long‐pitch helical strands having rise and tilt measurements of 54 Å / 40° (left‐handed) and 66 Å / 45° (right‐handed) respectively.

Figure 6. Docking the X‐ray structure of M into the sub‐tomogram average.

Figure 6

  • A, B
    The published X‐ray structure for RSV M shows that it forms a dimer (PDB accession number 4V23).
  • C
    In the X‐ray structure, M‐dimers pack as stacked sheets in the (010) plane of the C2 crystals.
  • D
    Docking the M‐dimer into the 3D reconstruction shows a curved lattice with similar packing in virio to the planar sheets seen in the crystal structure.
  • E
    Close‐up view of the docked M coordinates.
  • F
    Measurements of the lattice spacings of M‐dimers in the docked model of the matrix layer. A low‐pitch helix corresponding to the (1,1) direction of the planar lattice (shown in panel C) has a spacing of 82 Å. Helix strands corresponding to the a and c axes in the C2 unit cell of the X‐ray structure have spacings of 54 Å and 66 Å respectively.

Our fitted model clearly establishes the orientation of M‐dimers relative to the viral envelope allowing the contact surface with the inner leaflet to be identified (Fig 7A). This surface is strongly positively charged (Fig 7B and C, Movie EV2 timepoint 2m 45s), whereas the interior surface of the matrix array presents stripes of negative charge (Fig 7D and E, Movie EV2 timepoint 2m 35s) that may be important in coordinating the packaging of M2‐1 and viral nucleocapsids. Attempts to fit the X‐ray structure such that the opposite face of the M‐dimer was apposed to the inner surface of the viral envelope resulted in poorer correlation between map and model, substantial regions of the model extending beyond the envelope of the reconstruction and extensive steric collision between dimers.

Figure 7. Orienting the matrix layer relative to the viral envelope and glycoproteins.

Figure 7

  • A
    A section through the sub‐tomogram average reconstruction with fitted coordinates for M shows the orientation of the M‐dimer relative to the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer.
  • B–E
    (B and C) A solvent excluded surface representation of the matrix layer is presented coloured to show the electrostatic potential. It shows that the surface facing the lipid bilayer is positively charged, while the surface facing the virion interior presents stripes of negative charge (D and E).
  • F
    A view of the docked model placed within a transparent isosurface of the sub‐tomogram average reconstruction and viewed at an isosurface threshold of 0 from the virion exterior shows that the noisy weak density that we attribute to the viral glycoprotein spikes aligns with the (1,1) helix (alternate strands are coloured pink and blue).

When considered in the context of the sub‐tomogram average viewed at lower isosurface threshold, the stripes of density that we have assigned to the viral glycoprotein spikes align to the array of M‐dimers (Fig 7F). The spacing of these stripes of density does not however match those in the raw tomograms (45 Å versus 135 Å). These data suggest that a helical array of glycoprotein spikes is coordinated by the matrix layer, albeit the helix of spikes does not exactly follow the underlying lattice of M‐dimers. Rather, the process of aligning sub‐tomograms to the lattice of the matrix layer has led to superposition of the more widely spaced array of spikes, manifesting as tightly packed rows of density that are an artefact of the reconstruction process.

Discussion

We have used cryogenic electron microscopy and tomography to study the structure of filamentous virions of respiratory syncytial virus propagated directly on the transmission electron microscopy support grid. This approach has allowed these large fragile structures to be imaged while minimising disruption caused by sample preparation. These data show that far from being a disordered pleomorphic virion comprising a membranous bag filled with nucleocapsid, RSV assembles highly ordered virions. Fourier analysis demonstrated that virions have extensive helical order. We were able to characterise the extent of this order by 3D imaging of virions using cryo‐ET, combined with sub‐tomogram averaging.

Nucleocapsid morphology and packaging of N‐RNA rings

Denoised tomograms of RSV filamentous virions revealed an abundance of nucleocapsids packaged within the virions. Many were seen to exhibit the classical herringbone morphology previously described for nucleocapsid‐like particles produced by heterologous expression of the RSV N protein (Bhella et al, 2002; Maclellan et al, 2007; Bakker et al, 2013). We also observed large numbers of ring‐shaped assemblies. These rings bear a striking resemblance to N‐RNA rings also previously described, and although rings are produced following heterologous expression of N proteins from a variety of mononegavirales (Bhella et al, 2002; Albertini et al, 2006; Alayyoubi et al, 2015), we believe that this is the first report of N‐RNA rings being produced in authentic virus infections. It is not known what RNA species is associated with virion‐associated N‐RNA rings. Some of the most abundant RNA species in RSV‐infected cells are short 21‐25 nt RNAs generated from the leader (le) and trailer (tr) promoter regions (Noton et al, 2012; Tremaglio et al, 2013; Braun et al, 2017). Previous studies have shown that a fraction of these RNAs are nuclease resistant, indicating that they can be encapsidated (Tremaglio et al, 2013). Although it is well accepted that N‐RNA rings would be expected to contain 70 nt of RNA encapsidated by 10 N protomers (Tawar et al, 2009; Bakker et al, 2013), it has been shown that if purified recombinant N protein is incubated with RNAs as short as 14 nt, it can form N‐RNA rings that are of similar dimensions as those reconstituted with longer RNAs (Gao et al, 2020). This suggests either that RNA is only required to nucleate the encapsidation event and that subsequent N‐N interactions allow formation of a 10‐protomer ring that is not necessarily entirely RNA‐bound, and/or that short N‐RNA complexes can associate together to form 10 N‐protomer rings containing multiple small RNA oligonucleotides. Thus, the ~ 20–25 nt RNAs found in abundance in RSV‐infected cells could potentially be incorporated into N‐RNA rings and packaged into virions. Whether N‐RNA rings fulfil a functional role in newly infected cells, such as nucleating liquid‐liquid phase separated biomolecular condensates to serve as transcription/replication centres (Rincheval et al, 2017; Roden & Gladfelter, 2021) or inhibiting cellular stress responses (Hanley et al, 2010) remains to be determined.

Packing of M‐dimers in the matrix layer and variations in filament radii

Fourier analysis of cryo‐EM images of filamentous virions showed the presence of helical ordering in these particles. The highly variable radii of filamentous virions together with the weak intensity of layer lines and missing principal maxima in the Fourier transforms frustrated our efforts to compute a 3D reconstruction using Fourier‐Bessel or real‐space methods. Nonetheless, these data encouraged us to continue investigating the structure of these important virions using tomography and sub‐tomogram averaging. This led to the calculation of a 3D reconstruction of the viral envelope that showed how M‐dimers pack together to form the matrix layer, unequivocally orienting the dimers relative to the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer and orienting the M lattice relative to the virion’s filament axis. Docking the X‐ray structure to our cryo‐EM 3D reconstruction showed that the curved lattice of M‐dimers closely matches the planar arrays previously seen in the M crystals. In Fig 6F, we show measurements of vectors along the lattice, a right‐handed (1,1) helix with a spacing of 82 Å between subunits and a left‐handed (a) helix with a spacing of 54 Å. The axial rise per subunit for each of these helices is approximately 5 Å and 45 Å respectively. If the matrix tube was to polymerise as a simple 1‐start, right‐handed (1,1) helix, then it would comprise eight helical strands (along the a or c directions) and have a radius of ~ 100 angstroms. This is considerably smaller than the measured radii of the matrix layers in our viral filaments, which ranged between 370 and 660 Å (Fig EV3). Thus, we expect the matrix layers of filamentous virions to exhibit more complex geometries assembling as n‐start (1,1) helices and incorporating different numbers of helical strands (likely between ~ 30 and ~ 50). The matrix layer can be thought of as a sheet corresponding to the (a,c) plane of the C2 crystal lattice that has been rolled into a tube. Because the number of helical strands in a filament is large, only small distortions would need to be introduced to bend the sheet to form a cylinder. Indeed, distortions of the M‐dimer interface that were postulated to foster curvature have been observed (Forster et al, 2015). Incorporating different numbers of helical strands in the matrix layer would accommodate the considerable variation in filament diameters that are observed. Although each different number of strands would be associated with different helical parameters, the underlying M lattice would remain the same.

Figure EV3. Radius measurements for the matrix layers in tomograms of RSV virions.

Figure EV3

Filamentous virions show a considerable variation in radius. M‐layer radii ranged between 370 and 660 Å and appear to show a multi‐modal distribution.

Helical ordering and clustering of glycoprotein spikes—implications for virion assembly, entry and the design of interventions to prevent RSV disease

Our tomograms showed several virions that exhibited clear helical ordering of glycoproteins, features confirmed by sub‐tomogram averaging. Measurements of the spacing between successive turns of these helices gave a mean value of 135 Å. The spacing between strands of the low‐rise right‐handed (1,1) helix of M‐dimers that coincides with the stripes of density attributed to the glycoprotein spikes in our sub‐tomogram average was 45 Å however. This, together with the weak intensity of this feature in the reconstruction (usually a consequence of low‐occupancy and/or incoherent averaging), indicates that the helical ordering of the glycoprotein spikes is coordinated by, but not congruent with the underlying lattice of matrix proteins. The most likely explanation of this anomaly is that the helical array of glycoprotein spikes is coordinated by every third (1,1) helical strand (and less frequently by every second or fourth strand). Whether this phenomenon is simply a consequence of steric collision preventing association of a glycoprotein spike with every M‐dimer, or an allosteric mechanism whereby binding of a glycoprotein spike to one matrix dimer favours binding to successive dimers on the same strand, or prevents binding on adjacent strands, remains to be determined.

Intriguingly, we have found that glycoprotein spikes tend to cluster in pairs. This finding may have considerable implications for our understanding of both viral attachment and entry processes, as well as epitope presentation and vaccine design. Further investigation targeting the structure of paired glycoprotein spikes will be necessary to establish whether they comprise F‐F, G‐G or F‐G clusters, and whether clustering is coordinated by M, or an intrinsic property of the glycoprotein spikes. The spacing of glycoprotein spikes in doublets on filamentous virions was measured at 84 Å, whereas the spacing of M‐dimers along the low‐pitch helix measured 82 Å. Thus, doublet formation may be coordinated by M packing, the slightly larger spacing being a consequence of the measurements being made at a higher radius. Sub‐tomogram averaging using masks to target both the glycoprotein spikes and M from tomograms of virions that have very well‐ordered glycoproteins may therefore provide a more detailed view of the interaction between M‐dimers and the cytoplasmic tails of glycoproteins and confirm whether M coordinates glycoprotein spike doublet formation as well as helical packing.

In addition to helical ordering of glycoprotein spikes with doublet formation, we also observed formation of an alternate lattice of glycoprotein spikes, seen on a large pleomorphic virion. Measurements of this array indicated closer packing of spikes (74 Å), although the analysis was subject to greater ambiguity, owing to the less sharply resolved density. It would be interesting to establish whether this mode of packing reflects ordering of glycoprotein spikes at the plasma membrane and whether it too is coordinated by M. It has previously been shown that M is critical for the formation of filaments but not nucleation of budding sites (Mitra et al, 2012). Association of M with detergent‐resistant lipid microdomains (thought to be the sites of virion assembly) has been shown to depend on glycoprotein expression (Henderson et al, 2002; Marty et al, 2004). Confocal microscopy showed the presence of M protein in inclusion bodies and at the cytoplasmic side of the host cell plasma membrane (Marty et al, 2004). One possible interpretation of the honeycomb‐like packing of glycoprotein spikes may be that they (and possibly also M) have the potential to pack in a fullerene‐like manner at the plasma membrane, fostering the formation of hemispherical caps. Filament elongation might then be driven by assembly of the helical M‐dimer lattice, polymerising along the low‐pitch helix and engaging the cytoplasmic tails of F and G to form the membrane‐enclosed helically ordered virions we have observed. Further studies employing cryo‐ET of RSV budding sites may define more precisely the ordering of envelope‐associated proteins and glycoproteins at the plasma membrane and thereby inform our understanding of virion morphogenesis.

Summary

In the present study, we have used a range of cryogenic electron microscopy and image analysis approaches to characterise the structures of RSV filamentous virions. In so doing, we have shown that RSV packages large quantities of N‐RNA rings as well as full‐length genome containing nucleocapsids. We have provided a detailed description of the viral envelope, in which we discerned the packing of M‐dimers, describing how they are oriented relative to the inner leaflet of the viral envelope and how they are ordered to form a helical array. Furthermore, we show that the helical packing of M‐dimers coordinates helical ordering of viral glycoprotein spikes and that the spikes have a propensity to form doublets, a feature that may also be coordinated by M. Finally, we have described an alternate packing of glycoprotein spikes that may be important for virion morphogenesis.

Our findings indicate that future structural analyses have the potential to provide detailed insights into glycoprotein–matrix interactions that drive virion morphogenesis, information that may lead to interventions to treat RSV disease. Moreover, our discovery of extensive ordering of viral glycoproteins has implications for our understanding of the mechanisms of virus attachment and entry and may inform the design of more effective antigens for improved vaccines to prevent RSV disease.

Materials and Methods

Confocal microscopy

Vero cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Life Technologies, UK) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Life Technologies) at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Monolayers grown to 75% confluency on glass cover slips were infected with Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (strain A2—RSV) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5 for 1 h and then washed, replacing the media with DMEM containing 2% FBS. At 24‐, 48‐ and 72‐h timepoints, cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and 2.5% Triton X‐100 in PBSA, a blocking step of incubation with sheep serum for 1 h was followed by immunostaining for N using a mouse monoclonal antibody (αN009 (Murray et al, 2001)) and detected using a sheep anti‐mouse FITC conjugate (Sigma, UK). Phalloidin Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen, UK) was used to stain actin. Cells were mounted using ProLong Antifade plus DAPI reagent (Invitrogen, UK). Imaging was carried out with the Zeiss LSM710 laser scanning confocal microscope.

Propagation of RSV on cryo‐EM grids

Vero, U2‐OS or A549 cells were seeded on to cryo‐EM grids as follows. Freshly glow‐discharged finder gold quantifoil grids (200 mesh R2/2—Quantifoil MicroTools GmbH, Germany) were sterilised in 70% EtOH and placed in a glass‐bottomed MatTek dish (MatTek Corporation, MA, USA). 200 μl of laminin (50μg ml‐1) was added and incubated overnight. Grids were then washed in DMEM. 105 cells were added in 2 ml of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 overnight before infection. Cells were infected with RSV at a MOI of 1 and incubated for a further 72 h before being prepared for cryo‐EM.

Grids were frozen for cryo‐EM by plunge freezing. Briefly, 3 μl of a suspension of 5nm colloidal gold beads was pipetted onto each grid (BBI Solutions, United Kingdom). Grids were then transferred to a Vitrobot Mk IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific), blotted for four seconds and then immediately plunged into a bath of liquid ethane.

Imaging—projection images

RSV virions were imaged at the MRC—Laboratory of Molecular Biology on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Titan Krios microscope equipped with a Falcon II detector. The microscope was operated at a nominal magnification of 29k× giving a calibrated pixel size of 2.84 Å at the specimen scale. Micrographs were recorded as movies, comprising 70 individual frames and with a dose per frame of 1 electron/Å2 and at 18 frames per second.

Imaging—tomography

Initial tomography experiments were performed on a JEOL 2200 FS equipped with a Gatan Ultrascan 4000 CCD detector and 914 cryo‐holder. Continuous tilt‐series were collected, using SerialEM, from −60° to +60° at 2° intervals and at a nominal magnification of 20k×, corresponding to an unbinned pixel size of 5.32 Å at the specimen scale. Improved tomography data, suitable for sub‐tomogram averaging, were then collected at the UK electron bio‐imaging centre at Diamond Light Source (eBIC) on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Titan Krios microscope equipped with a Gatan BioQuantum K2 energy filtered direct detection camera. Dose‐symmetric tilt‐series collection was performed using SerialEM (Mastronarde, 2005; Hagen et al, 2017). Energy‐filtered images were collected with a slit‐width of 20eV and an applied defocus of between −2 and −4.5 μm. One‐second exposures were recorded with an electron exposure of 2 electrons/Å2, partitioned over five movie frames. A total of 41 images were recorded per tilt‐series at 3° intervals from −60° to +60°, and thus, a total exposure of 82 electrons/Å2 was applied per tilt‐series. Tilt‐series were recorded at a nominal column magnification of 81k× corresponding to a calibrated pixel size of 1.79 Å at the specimen scale.

Fourier analysis

Projection images and their Fourier transforms were initially visualised using Ximdisp (Smith, 1999). Indexing was performed using PyHI (Zhang, 2021). Fourier synthesis was used to produce a filtered image of the helical components by assigning crystallographic indices to pairs of reflections in the Fourier transform. The image was reconstituted by masking and inverse Fourier transformation using trmask, a program within the MRC image processing software suite (Crowther et al, 1996).

Tomogram calculation

Individual movies were corrected for drift and beam‐induced motion using MotionCor2 (Zheng et al, 2017). Motion corrected images were then compiled into an angle ordered stack file using a perl script to extract the correct files and tilt angles from the SerialEM metadata files (mdoc), creating the final tilt‐series using the IMOD command newstack (Kremer et al, 1996). Tilt‐series alignment and reconstruction by weighted back projection were then accomplished using the IMOD package. Defocus estimation was performed using CTFFIND4 (Rohou & Grigorieff, 2015). For visualisation and interpretation, tomograms were binned by a factor of four and then denoised using the denoise3d option in Topaz (Bepler et al, 2020).

Sub‐tomogram averaging

Tomograms were recalculated with a SIRT‐like filter (50 iterations) and 8× binning to assist in filament axis definition and particle picking in Dynamo (Castano‐Diez et al, 2012, 2017). A catalogue was created with 10 tomograms containing 11 filamentous RSV virions. Sub‐tomogram/particle coordinates were defined along the filaments using the “crop on rings along path” model in Dynamo (Fig EV4). From the 10 tomograms, 30,088 sub‐tomograms were extracted from the oversampled coordinates in a box size of 323 pixels, oriented normal to the filament/viral envelope. An initial average was calculated and smeared along the filament major axis to produce a featureless reference. More accurate sub‐tomogram positions were calculated by running an alignment project with the featureless reference and allowing shifts only in the z direction to locate the precise position of the viral envelope.

Figure EV4. Schematic diagram of the sub‐tomogram averaging process.

Figure EV4

Sub‐tomogram positions were defined, and alignments were performed using Dynamo. Resolution assessment was performed using Relion.

Sub‐tomograms were aligned to a smeared and low pass filtered reference while allowing angular and rotational searches of 15° with 5° sampling. Shifts of 4, 4 and 1 pixels were permitted in X, Y and Z directions respectively. Initial alignments were performed with a wide saddle‐shaped mask (to exclude density from the viral envelope and M2‐1 layers) followed by a tighter mask. Upon completion of the alignment projects, the sub‐tomograms were re‐centred in the extraction boxes based on the improved coordinates and extracted from tomograms with a reduced level of binning, that is 4×, 2× and 1× binning. 15 alignment iterations were performed at each binning level. The averaging and alignment protocols were repeated for each reduced level of binning with an increasing box size until unbinned averages were attained (in a 2563 box). For the final alignment step, sub‐tomograms were extracted from tomograms calculated using weighted back projection (i.e. omitting the SIRT‐like filter). Half‐maps were generated and compared using the Relion post‐processing and local‐resolution tests (Scheres, 2012). A FSC cut‐off of 0.5 was adopted to measure the resolution of the map for the M‐layer using a saddle‐shaped mask. Averages were visualised, and X‐ray structures were fitted in UCSF Chimera and ChimeraX (Pettersen et al, 2004, 2021).

Author contributions

The MRC‐University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research uses the CRediT taxonomy of author contributions. MJC performed formal analysis, investigation and methodology; wrote original draft; and reviewed and edited. JMS performed formal analysis, investigation and methodology; wrote original draft; and reviewed and edited the manuscript. AMB, HJ and JH performed investigation. JS performed investigation and reviewed and edited the manuscript. JH involved in formal analysis and methodology, and reviewed and edited. SEB involved in investigation and supervision, reviewed and edited. BJP performed investigation and wrote original draft. GZ involved in methodology and supervision, and reviewed and edited. PRM involved in conceptualisation and funding acquisition. MS involved in formal analysis and methodology; wrote original draft; and reviewed and edited. RF involved in conceptualisation and funding acquisition; wrote original draft; reviewed and edited. SV involved in investigation, methodology and supervision, and reviewed and edited. DB involved in conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision and visualisation; wrote original draft; and reviewed and edited.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Expanded View Figures PDF

Movie EV1

Movie EV2

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Drs. Greg McMullan and Kutti R Vinothkumar for support with data collection at the LMB. We thank Diamond Light Source for access to the Cryo‐EM facilities at the UK national electron bio‐imaging centre (eBIC), proposal EM16637‐5, funded by the Wellcome Trust, MRC and BBSRC. We are indebted to Daniel Clare for his expert assistance during dose‐symmetric tomography data collection at eBIC.

This work was supported by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12014/7 to DB; MR/M000451/1 to DB, RF, MJC, JS and SEB; MC_UU_12014/9 to PRM and JH; MC‐A025‐5PL41 to MS). RF, DB and AMB were supported by the United States of America National Institutes of Health (1R01AI113321). BJP and HJ were supported by a Wellcome doctoral training programme (102463/Z/13/Z and 099786/Z/12/Z respectively).

The EMBO Journal (2022) 41: e109728

Contributor Information

Swetha Vijayakrishnan, Email: Swetha.Vijayakrishnan@glasgow.ac.uk.

David Bhella, Email: David.bhella@glasgow.ac.uk.

Data availability

The sub‐tomogram average described in this paper and a representative tomogram have been deposited in the electron microscopy data bank with accession numbers EMD‐13855 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD‐13855) and EMD‐13856 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD‐13856) respectively.

References

  1. Ackerson B, Tseng HF, Sy LS, Solano Z, Slezak J, Luo Y, Fischetti CA, Shinde V (2019) Severe morbidity and mortality associated with respiratory syncytial virus versus influenza infection in hospitalized older adults. Clin Infect Dis 69: 197–203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alayyoubi M, Leser GP, Kors CA, Lamb RA (2015) Structure of the paramyxovirus parainfluenza virus 5 nucleoprotein‐RNA complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: E1792–E1799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albertini AA, Wernimont AK, Muziol T, Ravelli RB, Clapier CR, Schoehn G, Weissenhorn W, Ruigrok RW (2006) Crystal structure of the rabies virus nucleoprotein‐RNA complex. Science 313: 360–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachi T, Howe C (1973) Morphogenesis and ultrastructure of respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 12: 1173–1180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakker SE, Duquerroy S, Galloux M, Loney C, Conner E, Eleouet JF, Rey FA, Bhella D (2013) The respiratory syncytial virus nucleoprotein‐RNA complex forms a left‐handed helical nucleocapsid. J Gen Virol 94: 1734–1738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bepler T, Kelley K, Noble AJ, Berger B (2020) Topaz‐Denoise: general deep denoising models for cryoEM and cryoET. Nat Commun 11: 5208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bermingham A, Collins PL (1999) The M2–2 protein of human respiratory syncytial virus is a regulatory factor involved in the balance between RNA replication and transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 11259–11264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhella D, Ralph A, Murphy LB, Yeo RP (2002) Significant differences in nucleocapsid morphology within the Paramyxoviridae. J Gen Virol 83: 1831–1839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun MR, Deflube LR, Noton SL, Mawhorter ME, Tremaglio CZ, Fearns R (2017) RNA elongation by respiratory syncytial virus polymerase is calibrated by conserved region V. PLoS Pathog 13: e1006803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castagne N, Barbier A, Bernard J, Rezaei H, Huet JC, Henry C, Costa BD, Eleouet JF (2004) Biochemical characterization of the respiratory syncytial virus P‐P and P‐N protein complexes and localization of the P protein oligomerization domain. J Gen Virol 85: 1643–1653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Castano‐Diez D, Kudryashev M, Arheit M, Stahlberg H (2012) Dynamo: a flexible, user‐friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo‐EM data in high‐performance computing environments. J Struct Biol 178: 139–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Castano‐Diez D, Kudryashev M, Stahlberg H (2017) Dynamo Catalogue: Geometrical tools and data management for particle picking in subtomogram averaging of cryo‐electron tomograms. J Struct Biol 197: 135–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Collins PL, Hill MG, Camargo E, Grosfeld H, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1995) Production of infectious human respiratory syncytial virus from cloned cDNA confirms an essential role for the transcription elongation factor from the 5' proximal open reading frame of the M2 mRNA in gene expression and provides a capability for vaccine development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 11563–11567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crowther RA, Henderson R, Smith JM (1996) MRC image processing programs. J Struct Biol 116: 9–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fearns R, Collins PL (1999) Role of the M2–1 transcription antitermination protein of respiratory syncytial virus in sequential transcription. J Virol 73: 5852–5864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Forster A, Maertens GN, Farrell PJ, Bajorek M (2015) Dimerization of matrix protein is required for budding of respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 89: 4624–4635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Galloux M, Tarus B, Blazevic I, Fix J, Duquerroy S, Eleouet JF (2012) Characterization of a viral phosphoprotein binding site on the surface of the respiratory syncytial nucleoprotein. J Virol 86: 8375–8387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galloux M, Risso‐Ballester J, Richard CA, Fix J, Rameix‐Welti MA, Eleouet JF (2020) Minimal elements required for the formation of respiratory syncytial virus cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in vivo and in vitro . MBio 11: e01202‐20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao Y, Cao D, Ahn HM, Swain A, Hill S, Ogilvie C, Kurien M, Rahmatullah T, Liang B (2020) In vitro trackable assembly of RNA‐specific nucleocapsids of the respiratory syncytial virus. J Biol Chem 295: 883–895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Garcia‐Barreno B, Delgado T, Melero JA (1996) Identification of protein regions involved in the interaction of human respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein and nucleoprotein: significance for nucleocapsid assembly and formation of cytoplasmic inclusions. J Virol 70: 801–808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilman MSA, Liu C, Fung A, Behera I, Jordan P, Rigaux P, Ysebaert N, Tcherniuk S, Sourimant J, Eléouët J‐F et al (2019) Structure of the respiratory syncytial virus polymerase complex. Cell 179: 193–204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hagen WJH, Wan W, Briggs JAG (2017) Implementation of a cryo‐electron tomography tilt‐scheme optimized for high resolution subtomogram averaging. J Struct Biol 197: 191–198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haney J, Vijayakrishnan S, Streetley J, Dee K, Goldfarb DM, Clarke M, Mullin M, Carter SD, Bhella D, Murcia PR (2021) Generation of chimeric respiratory viruses with altered tropism by coinfection of influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.08.16.456460 [PREPRINT] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanley LL, McGivern DR, Teng MN, Djang R, Collins PL, Fearns R (2010) Roles of the respiratory syncytial virus trailer region: effects of mutations on genome production and stress granule formation. Virology 406: 241–252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hardy RW, Wertz GW (1998) The product of the respiratory syncytial virus M2 gene ORF1 enhances readthrough of intergenic junctions during viral transcription. J Virol 72: 520–526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Henderson G, Murray J, Yeo RP (2002) Sorting of the respiratory syncytial virus matrix protein into detergent‐resistant structures is dependent on cell‐surface expression of the glycoproteins. Virology 300: 244–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van den Hoogen BG, de Jong JC, Groen J, Kuiken T, de Groot R, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD (2001) A newly discovered human pneumovirus isolated from young children with respiratory tract disease. Nat Med 7: 719–724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ke Z, Dillard R, Chirkova T, Leon F, Stobart C, Hampton C, Strauss J, Rajan D, Rostad C, Taylor J et al (2018) The morphology and assembly of respiratory syncytial virus revealed by cryo‐electron tomography. Viruses 10: 446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kiss G, Holl JM, Williams GM, Alonas E, Vanover D, Lifland AW, Gudheti M, Guerrero‐Ferreira RC, Nair V, Yi H et al (2014) Structural analysis of respiratory syncytial virus reveals the position of M2–1 between the matrix protein and the ribonucleoprotein complex. J Virol 88: 7602–7617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR (1996) Computer visualization of three‐dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol 116: 71–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuppan JP, Mitrovich MD, Vahey MD (2021) A morphological transformation in respiratory syncytial virus leads to enhanced complement activation. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.05.06.442421 [PREPRINT] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kwon YS, Park SH, Kim MA, Kim HJ, Park JS, Lee MY, Lee CW, Dauti S, Choi WI (2017) Risk of mortality associated with respiratory syncytial virus and influenza infection in adults. BMC Infect Dis 17: 785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Leyrat C, Renner M, Harlos K, Huiskonen JT, Grimes JM (2014a) Drastic changes in conformational dynamics of the antiterminator M2–1 regulate transcription efficiency in Pneumovirinae. eLife 3: e02674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Leyrat C, Renner M, Harlos K, Huiskonen JT, Grimes JM (2014b) Structure and self‐assembly of the calcium binding matrix protein of human metapneumovirus. Structure 22: 136–148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li T, Li Z, Deans EE, Mittler E, Liu M, Chandran K, Ivanovic T (2021) The shape of pleomorphic virions determines resistance to cell‐entry pressure. Nat Microbiol 6: 617–629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liljeroos L, Krzyzaniak MA, Helenius A, Butcher SJ (2013) Architecture of respiratory syncytial virus revealed by electron cryotomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 11133–11138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Loney C, Mottet‐Osman G, Roux L, Bhella D (2009) Paramyxovirus ultrastructure and genome packaging: cryo‐electron tomography of sendai virus. J Virol 83: 8191–8197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Maclellan K, Loney C, Yeo RP, Bhella D (2007) The 24‐angstrom structure of respiratory syncytial virus nucleocapsid protein‐RNA decameric rings. J Virol 81: 9519–9524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Marty A, Meanger J, Mills J, Shields B, Ghildyal R (2004) Association of matrix protein of respiratory syncytial virus with the host cell membrane of infected cells. Arch Virol 149: 199–210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mason SW, Aberg E, Lawetz C, DeLong R, Whitehead P, Liuzzi M (2003) Interaction between human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) M2–1 and P proteins is required for reconstitution of M2‐1‐dependent RSV minigenome activity. J Virol 77: 10670–10676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mastronarde DN (2005) Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J Struct Biol 152: 36–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mazumder B, Barik S (1994) Requirement of casein kinase II‐mediated phosphorylation for the transcriptional activity of human respiratory syncytial viral phosphoprotein P: transdominant negative phenotype of phosphorylation‐defective P mutants. Virology 205: 104–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. McLellan JS, Yang Y, Graham BS, Kwong PD (2011) Structure of respiratory syncytial virus fusion glycoprotein in the postfusion conformation reveals preservation of neutralizing epitopes. J Virol 85: 7788–7796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. McLellan JS, Chen M, Leung S, Graepel KW, Du X, Yang Y, Zhou T, Baxa U, Yasuda E, Beaumont T et al (2013) Structure of RSV fusion glycoprotein trimer bound to a prefusion‐specific neutralizing antibody. Science 340: 1113–1117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Mejias A, Rodriguez‐Fernandez R, Oliva S, Peeples ME, Ramilo O (2020) The journey to a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 125: 36–46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mitra R, Baviskar P, Duncan‐Decocq RR, Patel D, Oomens AG (2012) The human respiratory syncytial virus matrix protein is required for maturation of viral filaments. J Virol 86: 4432–4443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Money VA, McPhee HK, Mosely JA, Sanderson JM, Yeo RP (2009) Surface features of a Mononegavirales matrix protein indicate sites of membrane interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 4441–4446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Murphy LB, Loney C, Murray J, Bhella D, Ashton P, Yeo RP (2003) Investigations into the amino‐terminal domain of the respiratory syncytial virus nucleocapsid protein reveal elements important for nucleocapsid formation and interaction with the phosphoprotein. Virology 307: 143–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Murray J, Loney C, Murphy LB, Graham S, Yeo RP (2001) Characterization of monoclonal antibodies raised against recombinant respiratory syncytial virus nucleocapsid (N) protein: identification of a region in the carboxy terminus of N involved in the interaction with P protein. Virology 289: 252–261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Norrby E, Marusyk H, Orvell C (1970) Morphogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus in a green monkey kidney cell line (Vero). J Virol 6: 237–242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Noton SL, Deflube LR, Tremaglio CZ, Fearns R (2012) The respiratory syncytial virus polymerase has multiple RNA synthesis activities at the promoter. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ouizougun‐Oubari M, Pereira N, Tarus B, Galloux M, Lassoued S, Fix J, Tortorici MA, Hoos S, Baron B, England P et al (2015) A druggable pocket at the nucleocapsid/phosphoprotein interaction site of human respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 89: 11129–11143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25: 1605–1612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Meng EC, Couch GS, Croll TI, Morris JH, Ferrin TE (2021) UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci 30: 70–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rima B, Collins P, Easton A, Fouchier R, Kurath G, Lamb RA, Lee B, Maisner A, Rota P, Wang L et al (2017) ICTV virus taxonomy profile: pneumoviridae. J Gen Virol 98: 2912–2913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rincheval V, Lelek M, Gault E, Bouillier C, Sitterlin D, Blouquit‐Laye S, Galloux M, Zimmer C, Eleouet JF, Rameix‐Welti MA (2017) Functional organization of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in cells infected by respiratory syncytial virus. Nat Commun 8: 563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Roden C, Gladfelter AS (2021) RNA contributions to the form and function of biomolecular condensates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 22: 183–195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rohou A, Grigorieff N (2015) CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol 192: 216–221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Scheres SH (2012) RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo‐EM structure determination. J Struct Biol 180: 519–530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Selvaraj M, Yegambaram K, Todd E, Richard CA, Dods RL, Pangratiou GM, Trinh CH, Moul SL, Murphy JC, Mankouri J et al (2018) The structure of the human respiratory syncytial virus M2‐1 protein bound to the interaction domain of the phosphoprotein P defines the orientation of the complex. MBio 9: e01554‐18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shi T, McAllister DA, O'Brien KL, Simoes EAF, Madhi SA, Gessner BD, Polack FP, Balsells E, Acacio S, Aguayo C et al (2017) Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children in 2015: a systematic review and modelling study. Lancet 390: 946–958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith JM (1999) Ximdisp–a visualization tool to aid structure determination from electron microscope images. J Struct Biol 125: 223–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tanner SJ, Ariza A, Richard C‐A, Kyle HF, Dods RL, Blondot M‐L, Wu W, Trincao J, Trinh CH, Hiscox JA et al (2014) Crystal structure of the essential transcription antiterminator M2–1 protein of human respiratory syncytial virus and implications of its phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 1580–1585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tawar RG, Duquerroy S, Vonrhein C, Varela PF, Damier‐Piolle L, Castagné N, MacLellan K, Bedouelle H, Bricogne G, Bhella D et al (2009) Crystal structure of a nucleocapsid‐like nucleoprotein‐RNA complex of respiratory syncytial virus. Science 326: 1279–1283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tran T‐L, Castagné N, Bhella D, Varela PF, Bernard J, Chilmonczyk S, Berkenkamp S, Benhamo V, Grznarova K, Grosclaude J et al (2007) The nine C‐terminal amino acids of the respiratory syncytial virus protein P are necessary and sufficient for binding to ribonucleoprotein complexes in which six ribonucleotides are contacted per N protein protomer. J Gen Virol 88: 196–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Tremaglio CZ, Noton SL, Deflube LR, Fearns R (2013) Respiratory syncytial virus polymerase can initiate transcription from position 3 of the leader promoter. J Virol 87: 3196–3207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vahey MD, Fletcher DA (2019) Influenza A virus surface proteins are organized to help penetrate host mucus. eLife 8: e43764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Vijayakrishnan S, Loney C, Jackson D, Suphamungmee W, Rixon FJ, Bhella D (2013) Cryotomography of budding influenza A virus reveals filaments with diverse morphologies that mostly do not bear a genome at their distal end. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang X (2021) Python‐based Helix Indexer: A graphical user interface program for finding symmetry of helical assembly through Fourier‐Bessel indexing of electron microscopic data. Protein Sci 10.1002/pro.4186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zheng SQ, Palovcak E, Armache JP, Verba KA, Cheng Y, Agard DA (2017) MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam‐induced motion for improved cryo‐electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14: 331–332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Expanded View Figures PDF

    Movie EV1

    Movie EV2

    Data Availability Statement

    The sub‐tomogram average described in this paper and a representative tomogram have been deposited in the electron microscopy data bank with accession numbers EMD‐13855 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD‐13855) and EMD‐13856 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD‐13856) respectively.


    Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

    RESOURCES