Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;39(1):219–226. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.101601

TABLE 3.

Between and within groups differences in experimental and control groups before and after the 8-week intervention.

Variable Group Pre
Post
Δ% ANOVA (group x time) Bonferroni post-hoc (time) p-value (ES: d)
M SD M SD
Muscle strength
1RM (kg) EBTG
CG
99.14
92.69
21.60
11.31
124.36*
97.15
26.86
12.42
25.44
4.81
F(1, 25) = 118.95, p < 0.001, ƞp² = 0.83 < 0.001 (2.74)
0.02 (0.50)
RSI EBTG
CG
1.35
1.37
0.15
0.26
1.57
1.39
0.16
0.42
16.30
1.46
F(1, 25) = 2.40, p = 0.13, ƞp² = 0.09 0.03 (1.91)
0.95 (0.02)

Muscle power
CMJ (cm) EBTG
CG
33.36
32.89
3.70
5.97
36.83*
31.62
4.00
4.84
10.40
-3.86
F(1, 25) = 3.97, p < 0.05, ƞp² = 0.14 < 0.001 (1.34)
0.25 (0.34)
SLJ (cm) EBTG
CG
201.29
190.00
24.93
7.25
220.00*
190.54
26.02
5.53
9.30 0.28 F(1, 25) = 24.25, p < 0.001, ƞp² = 0.49 < 0.001 (1.65)
0.79 (0.07)

Balance
CoP SA (mm2) EBTG
CG
465.18
380.29
265.21
163.22
483.24
389.38
310.11
166.98
2.88
2.39
F(1, 25) = 0.05, p = 0.82, ƞp² = 0.002 0.99 (0.003)
0.24 (0.35)
CoP X (mm) EBTG
CG
533.97
477.46
211.61
61.33
498.47
481.68
212.94
58.80
-6.65
0.88
F(1, 25) = 2.18, p = 0.14, ƞp² = 0.08 0.19 (0.37)
0.17 (0.41)
CoP Y (mm) EBTG
CG
637.21
510.64
234.58
100.81
526.31
516.06
200.38
106.88
-17.40
1.06
F(1, 25) = 13.26, p < 0.001 ƞp² = 0.35 < 0.001 (0.97)
0.15 (0.42)
CoP V (mm/s) EBTG
CG
17.84
15.73
6.02
2.25
16.48
16.59
5.53
3.73
-7.62
5.47
F(1, 25) = 2.31, p = 0.14, ƞp² = 0.09 0.09 (0.49)
0.58 (0.16)
*

Statistically significant difference between experimental and control group in post-intervention values. Numbers in bold type highlight statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Values are presented as mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and percentage of variation from baseline to follow up (Δ%); F values, level of significance (p-value), and effect sizes (ES; eta partial squared (ƞp²); Cohen’s d (d)) in brackets of the between and within groups comparison are also displayed. EBTG: elastic band training group; CG: control group; 1RM: one repetition maximum; reactive strength index (RSI) was calculated as a ratio of the jump height (m) divided by the contact time with the ground (s); CMJ: countermovement jump; SLJ: standing long jump; CoP SA: centre of pressure sway area (representing the ellipse area covered by the trajectory of the CoP); CoP X: centre of pressure displacement in the mediolateral plane; CoP Y: centre of pressure displacement in the anteroposterior plane; V: velocity of the displacement of the CoP. For all the balance parameters (CoP), the lower the value the better the result.