Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;379(2212):20200258. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0258

Table 2.

A comparison of our model's overall F1 scores between using the optimal ECG-lead subset and using the complete 12-lead ECG on different datasets. p-values were calculated using the independent two-sample t-test between the overall F1 scores using the optimal 4-lead ECG and using the complete 12-lead ECG. A p-value < 0.05 means the optimal 4-lead ECG system provides a significant improvement in classifying ECG abnormalities over the complete 12-lead ECG.

datasets F1 scores using the optimal 4-lead ECG F1 scores using the complete 12-lead ECG p-value
CPSC 2018 (8 ECG abnormality types) validation 0.802 ± 0.004 0.789 ± 0.004 0.000
held-out test 0.764 ± 0.005 0.769 ± 0.005 0.123
PhysioNet/CinC 2020 (4 ECG abnormality types) external test 0.547 ± 0.001 0.537 ± 0.001 0.000