Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Dec 5;90:147–149. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.11.017

Table 1.

Participant Demographics at Baseline

Characteristic Total (N=441) MCI (N=313) AD (N=128) p-value
Age (Years) 72.5 (7.7) 71.7 (7.3) 74.4 (8.4) 0.001
Female (n, %) 191 (43.3) 140 (44.7) 51 (39.8) 0.347
Education (Years) 16.2 (2.6) 16.4 (2.6) 15.8 (2.6) 0.021
Tau/Aβ42 ratio* 0.73 (0.55) 0.60 (0.47) 1.05 (0.60) <0.001
MEM Cognitive Composite −0.073 (0.82) 0.25 (0.70) −0.88 (0.49) <0.001
EF Cognitive Composite −0.028 (1.07) 0.32 (0.92) −0.87 (0.96) <0.001
MEM Pathology Composite 0 (0.34) −0.12(0.30) 0.27(0.27) <0.001
EF Pathology Composite 0 (0.45) −0.14(0.40) 0.34(0.36) <0.001

Demographic, pathology, and performance information is displayed for all participants. Reported values are mean with standard deviation, beside gender. Those with AD were significantly older, had greater AD pathology burden, were less educated, and performed worse on neurocognitive testing than those with MCI.

*

A total of 15 participants were missing data on this component of the pathology composite.