Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov;32(11):2948–2957. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021040579

Table 2.

Adjusted, interval-specific effects of 2020 versus the forecast of 2020 on the incidence of eGFR <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and PD utilization among all patients who initiated dialysis and the incidence of catheter utilization among all patients who initiated hemodialysis

Weeks Absolute Effect, Difference (95% CI)a Relative Effect, OR (95% CI)b
Percentage of dialysis patients with eGFR <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2
 Weeks 3–6 0.01 (−1.20 to 1.22) 1.00 (0.95 to 1.05)
 Weeks 7–10 0.48 (−0.73 to 1.70) 1.02 (0.97 to 1.08)
 Weeks 11–14 1.14 (−0.16 to 2.40) 1.05 (0.99 to 1.11)
 Weeks 15–18 1.74 (0.41 to 3.07) 1.08 (1.02 to 1.15)
 Weeks 19–22 2.86 (1.57 to 4.16) 1.14 (1.07 to 1.20)
 Weeks 23–36 2.31 (1.03 to 3.59) 1.11 (1.05 to 1.17)
Percentage of dialysis patients performing PD
 Weeks 3–6 0.40 (−0.35 to 1.15) 1.05 (0.96 to 1.13)
 Weeks 7–10 0.95 (0.18 to 1.72) 1.11 (1.03 to 1.20)
 Weeks 11–14 2.33 (1.50 to 3.17) 1.24 (1.14 to 1.34)
 Weeks 15–18 1.79 (0.93 to 2.66) 1.17 (1.07 to 1.27)
 Weeks 19–22 0.03 (−0.79 to 0.86) 1.00 (0.92 to 1.09)
 Weeks 23–36 1.13 (0.30 to 1.96) 1.09 (1.01 to 1.18)
Percentage of hemodialysis patients with a CVC
 Weeks 3–6 −1.06 (−2.08 to −0.04) 0.94 (0.87 to 1.00)
 Weeks 7–10 −0.55 (−1.57 to 0.47) 0.97 (0.91 to 1.04)
 Weeks 11–14 0.84 (−0.25 to 1.92) 1.07 (0.99 to 1.15)
 Weeks 15–18 3.34 (2.25 to 4.44) 1.30 (1.20 to 1.41)
 Weeks 19–22 1.05 (−0.04 to 2.14) 1.08 (1.00 to 1.17)
 Weeks 23–36 0.04 (−1.05 to 1.13) 1.00 (0.93 to 1.08)

“Forecast” of 2020 based on the secular trends of 2017–2019 continuing into 2020.

a

Percentage differences estimated from LPRMs.

b

ORs estimated from logistic regression models.