Table 2.
Descriptive Statistics for Clinical Care Indicators
| Characteristics | Donabedian Model |
Total (n = 178) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Structure (n = 2) |
Process (n = 136) |
Outcome (n = 40) |
||
| Clinical care category | ||||
| Cardiovascular and circulatory system | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (2.5%) | 2 (1.1%) |
| Chronic pain | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.5%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.1%) |
| General patient care (all patients) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 17 (42.5%) | 17 (9.6%) |
| Geriatrics | 0 (0%) | 22 (16.2%) | 1 (2.5%) | 23 (12.9%) |
| Gynecology, urology, proctology | 0 (0%) | 9 (6.6%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (5.1%) |
| Intensive care | – | – | – | 0 (0%) |
| Mental health | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.6%) |
| Musculoskeletal | 0 (0%) | 30 (22.1%) | 8 (20%) | 38 (21.4%) |
| Neurology | 1 (50%) | 7 (5.2%) | 5 (12.5%) | 13 (7.3%) |
| Pediatrics | – | – | – | 0 (0%) |
| Pulmonology | 1 (50%) | 37 (27.2%) | 5 (12.5%) | 43 (24.2%) |
| Rheumatology | 0 (0%) | 22 (16.2%) | 1 (2.5%) | 23 (12.9%) |
| Other specialties | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.5%) | 1 (0.6%) |
| Clinical setting applicability | ||||
| Ambulatory care | 1 (50%) | 38 (27.9%) | 5 (12.5%) | 44 (24.7%) |
| Ambulatory and inpatient care | 1 (50%) | 94 (69.1%) | 26 (65%) | 121 (68%) |
| Inpatient care | 0 (0%) | 4 (2.9%) | 9 (22.5%) | 13 (7.3%) |
| Health care quality domain | ||||
| Accessibility | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (2.5%) | 2 (1.1%) |
| Effectiveness | 1 (50%) | 114 (83.8%) | 32 (80%) | 147 (82.6%) |
| Efficiency | – | – | – | 0 (0%) |
| Equity | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.6%) |
| Patient-centered care | 0 (0%) | 11 (8.1%) | 2 (5%) | 13 (7.3%) |
| Safety | 0 (0%) | 10 (7.4%) | 5 (12.5%) | 15 (8.4%) |
| Level of evidence (Oxford Center of Evidence-Based Medicine) | ||||
| Level 1 | 1 (50%) | 44 (32.4%) | 2 (5%) | 47 (26.4%) |
| Level 2 | 0 (0%) | 14 (10.3%) | 4 (10%) | 18 (10.1%) |
| Level 3 | 0 (0%) | 20 (14.7%) | 4 (10%) | 24 (13.5%) |
| Level 4 | 0 (0%) | 8 (5.9%) | 4 (10%) | 12 (6.7%) |
| Level 5 | 1 (50%) | 50 (36.8%) | 26 (65%) | 77 (43.3%) |