Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;32(1):126–132. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab180

Table 4.

Association between pocket money and current e-cigarette use among students aged 11–17 years in the WHO European Region study sites with the latest available GYTS data

Countries or sites Less than medium amount
At least medium amount
Adj. PRa P-value
Unweighted n Weighted % (95% CI) Unweighted n Weighted % (95% CI) (95% CI)
Albania 102 4.8 212 8.5 1.4 0.025
(3.4–6.1) (6.9–10.0) (1.0–2.0)
Bulgaria 250 9.3 178 14.4 1.5 0.007
(6.9–11.7) (9.0–19.8) (1.1–2.0)
Croatia 60 5.7 362 12.3 1.8 <0.001
(3.5–7.9) (9.0–15.5) (1.4–2.4)
Georgia 77 9.4 82 17.7 1.8 0.001
(6.7–12.2) (12.2–23.1) (1.4–2.5)
Italy 102 12.8 207 23.1 1.7 <0.001
(9.5–16.1) (18.4–27.9) (1.3–2.3)
Latvia 323 15.7 414 21.6 1.3 0.001
(13.5–18.0) (19.6–23.5) (1.1–1.6)
Poland 606 22.5 692 32.3 1.3 <0.001
(19.9–25.2) (29.7–35.0) (1.2–1.5)
Romania 259 6.7 147 10.1 1.4 0.004
(5.4–8.0) (8.1–12.1) (1.1–1.7)
Serbia 149 5.5 116 11.6 1.9 <0.001
(4.2–6.7) (9.1–14.1) (1.5–2.5)
Slovakia 161 6.2 150 11.7 1.6 <0.001
(4.6–7.9) (8.4–15.0) (1.3–2.0)
The Czech Republic 321 9.7 88 22.5 2.1 <0.001
(7.6–11.7) (18.5–26.5) (1.7–2.6)
The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 270 9.4 402 15.7 1.6 <0.001
(7.8–11.0) (13.6–17.8) (1.3–1.9)
The Republic of Moldova 165 8.3 434 17.7 2.0 <0.001
(7.0–9.5) (15.0–20.3) (1.7–2.2)
The Republic of North Macedonia 53 3.5 152 4.4 1.2 0.263
(2.4–4.6) (2.8–5.9) (0.9–1.7)
Ukraine 322 13.5 293 25.7 1.8 <0.001
(10.0–16.9) (21.1–30.4) (1.4–2.3)
San Marinob 16 50 16.8 2.9
(12.9–20.7) (1.8–4.8)
Kyrgyzstanb 82 1.9 116 5.1
(1.2–2.6) (3.4–6.7)

Notes: P-values in bold represent statistically significant differences between prevalence of e-cigarette use among students, aged 11–17 years, who reported having at least medium amount of pocket money vs. no to less than medium amounts.

a

Adjusted by student’s age, sex and grade.

b

The insufficient sample size; hence, the resulting estimates may be unstable and are therefore, not reported. The regression coefficients for sex, pocket money and the interaction term between sex and pocket money were statistically significant suggesting differences in statistical effects of having at least medium amount of pocket money on prevalence of e-cigarette use between male and female students compared with having less than medium amount of pocket money.