Table 3.

The correlation between NAFLD markers (USFLI, HSI, NFS) and BMD at femoral neck and lumbar spine in participants aged ≥ 40.

	Femoral neck BMD	P	Lumbar spine BMD	P
USFLI	β (95% CI)		β (95% CI)
Model 1	-0.0005 (-0.0007, -0.0002)	<0.001	-0.0005 (-0.0008, -0.0001)	0.012
Model 2	-0.0005 (-0.0007, -0.0002)	<0.001	-0.0004 (-0.0008, -0.0001)	0.020
Model 3	-0.0004 (-0.0007, -0.0002)	0.002	-0.0005 (-0.0009, -0.0001)	0.021
Model 4	-0.0004 (-0.0007, -0.0002)	0.002	-0.0005 (-0.0009, -0.0001)	0.032
Model 5	-0.0004 (-0.0008, -0.0001)	0.028	-0.0006 (-0.0011, -0.0001)	0.033
HSI
Model 1	-0.0022 (-0.0033, -0.0011)	<0.001	-0.0048 (-0.0064, -0.0032)	<0.001
Model 2	-0.0021 (-0.0033, -0.0010)	<0.001	-0.0049 (-0.0065, -0.0032)	<0.001
Model 3	-0.0027 (-0.0044, -0.0009)	0.004	-0.0050 (-0.0070, -0.0020)	<0.001
Model 4	-0.0021 (-0.0039, -0.0004)	0.019	-0.0037 (-0.0062, -0.0011)	0.005
Model 5	-0.0023 (-0.0047, 0.0001)	0.062	-0.0037 (-0.0070, -0.0003)	0.032
NFS
Model 1	-0.0069 (-0.0092, -0.0046)	<0.001	0.0062 (0.0026, 0.0098)	<0.001
Model 2	-0.0067 (-0.0091, -0.0043)	<0.001	0.0063 (0.0027, 0.0099)	<0.001
Model 3	-0.0106 (-0.0146, -0.0067)	<0.001	0.0019 (-0.0041, 0.0079)	0.528
Model 4	-0.0100 (-0.0138, -0.0060)	<0.001	0.0015 (-0.0045, 0.0074)	0.629
Model 5	-0.0070 (-0.0123, -0.0015)	0.012	0.0046 (-0.0034, 0.0126)	0.262

Data are expressed as β coefficient (95% CI). Model 1 was adjusted for sex, age, race, BMI, waist circumference smoking, educational, marital, and economic status. Model 2 was adjusted for the adjustments of model 1 plus nutritional status, 25(OH)D and milk intake included. Model 3 was adjusted for hypertension, diabetes, HDL-C, TG, TC, and LDL-C in addition to model 2. Model 4 was adjusted for the adjustments of model 3 plus menopausal status. Model 5 was further adjusted for physical activity, not available for 2005-2006 period.