Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;2022:1203514. doi: 10.1155/2022/1203514

Table 5.

Observational checklist used to collect data from households (n = 380).

No. What was observed (present/absent if applicable) Yes (%) No (%) Remark
1 Household latrine 172 (45.3) 208 (54.7)
 A Latrine door 81(47.1) 91 (52.9) For households that had latrines
 B Latrine roof 82 (47.7) 90 (42.3)
 C Latrine hole cover 0 172{100)
 D Latrine water supply to clean 0 172(100)
 E Distance of latrine from kitchen
<6 m 61 (35.5) 111 (64.5)

2 Using public latrine 0 172 (100) For households without latrine

3 Practicing open defecation Various parts of the town were observed

4 Drinking-water source (n = 380)
 A Own private tap water 29 (7.6) 351(92.4)
 B Others private tap water For households with no private tap water
 C Public tap water 0 351(100) ∗∗
 D River
 E Spring
 F Pond/rain

Absence or presence was checked (Figures 13), but it was not possible to enumerate and calculate the percentages; ∗∗was implicated as no functional public taps were available in the town during the study.