Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;2022:1203514. doi: 10.1155/2022/1203514

Table 6.

Defecation areas, plans, reasons for not having latrine, and problems faced by participants of Negele town (n = 208) who had no latrine before and during the study period.

Variable Frequency (%) of participants per zone Overall (%)
Center East West
Defecation areas
 Open space 20 (23.8) 26 (30.2) 10 (26.3) 56 (26.9)
 Public toilet 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 In bush 16 (19.0) 29 (33.7) 9 (23.7) 54 (26.0)
 In house compound 42 (50.0) 22 (25.6) 16 (42.1) 80 (38.5)
 Any place as needed 6 (7.2) 9 (10.5) 3 (7.9) 18 (8.6)

Reasons for lack of latrine
 Not knowing the importance of latrine 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Lack of enough land 41 (48.8) 35 (40.7) 18 (47.4) 94(45.3)
 Lack of enough money 36 (42.9) 37 (43.0) 12 (31.6) 85 (40.8)
 Other 7 (8.3) 14 (16.3) 8 (21.0) 29 (13.9)

Problems faced due to lack of latrine
 Lack of safety 21 (25.0) 25 (29.1) 14 (36.8) 60 (28.8)
 Infectious disease 12 (12.3) 31 (36.0) 9 (23.7) 52 (25.0)
 Pollution of living area 32 (38.1) 13 (15.1) 6 (15.8) 51 (24.6)
 Moving out in the darkness 19 (22.6) 17 (19.8) 9 (23.7) 45 (21.6)

A person advised constructing a latrine
 Health extension 17 (20.2) 27 (31.4) 18 (47.4) 62 (29.8)
 Local leader 23 (27.4) 13 (15.1) 5 (13.1) 41 (19.7)
 Nobody 44 (52.4) 46 (53.5) 15 (39.5) 105 (50.5)

Having plan to contact latrine
 Yes 34 (40.5) 25 (29.1) 9 (23.7) 68 (32.7)
 No 50 (59.5) 61 (70.9) 29 (76.3) 140 (67.3)