Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 1;327(5):454–463. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24674

Table 3. Model-Based Hazard Ratios for DCM and Partial DCM Phenotypes in First-degree Relatives of Patients With DCM.

Predictor DCMa DCM or partial phenotypesa
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Proband race and ethnicity
Non-Hispanic
White 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Black 1.89 (1.26-2.83) .002 1.27 (0.99-1.63) .06
Hispanic
White 1.28 (0.64-2.54) .48 1.04 (0.66-1.65) .87
Black 1.51 (0.29-7.82) .63 0.93 (0.24-3.61) .92
Proband age at diagnosis, quartile
I (4.73-34.33 y) 2.19 (1.19-4.00) .01 1.67 (1.14-2.44) .008
II (34.34-44.16 y) 1.64 (0.91-2.95) .10 1.60 (1.09-2.35) .02
III (44.18-53.62 y) 1.23 (0.65-2.31) .53 1.28 (0.91-1.79) .15
IV (53.66-82.67 y) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]

Abbreviations: DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; GEE, generalized estimating equation; GLMM, generalized linear mixed model; HR, hazard ratio.

a

Within-program HRs and Wald 95% CIs for a Weibull proportional hazards survival model were obtained from a GEE-type GLMM fit to current disease status data (eTables 5 and 6 in Supplement 1; Supplement 3) and are adjusted for proband and first-degree relative sex and site in addition to other variables shown here; 1692 first-degree relatives contributed to this analysis (1 non-Hispanic White first-degree relative was excluded due to missing covariate data). Two-sided P values are for the null hypothesis that the HR is 1.