Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e050553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050553

Table 4.

Parameters for figure 2 that describes the new practice model

Name of parameter Description of parameter Mean Distribution
D_P_NP_NoTest Patients under new practice that do not require testing 54.41% Beta (1914, 1604)
D_P_NP_FurTest Patients under new practice that require testing 40.28% Beta (1417, 2101)
D_P_D Probability of patients in D who requests testing and get calcium tests 90.00% Beta (90, 10)
D_P_E Probability of patients in in the new practice who required further testing and underwent stress imaging 90.00% Beta (90, 10)
Calcium Score, three outcomes 0, <100 or >100 64.3%–24.2% 11.5% Dirichlet (1169, 441, 209)
D_P_E_Treatment Probability of patients in E who had treatment 32.50% Beta (325, 675)
D_P_F_Discharge Probability of patients in F who were discharged 32.50% Beta (325, 675)
D_P_D_CalSco1to100_StreIm Probability of patients in D with a calcium score of 1–100 who underwent stress Imaging 50.00% Beta (50, 50)
D_P_D_CalScoGr100_StreIm Probability of patients in D with a calcium score of greater than 100 who underwent stress Imaging 90.00% Beta (90, 10)
D_P_E_NormalE_Treatment Probability of patients in E who had normal outcomes and then treatment 53.96% Beta (613, 523)
D_P_D_CalSco1to100_StreIm_Norm Probability of patients in D with a calcium score of 1–100 with normal stress imaging 80.5% Uniform (0.74, 0.87)
D_P_D_CalScoGr100_StreIm_Ab Probability of patients in D with a calcium score of >100 who underwent stress imaging and it was abnormal 44.5% Uniform (0.43, 0.46)