Table 3.
Reported Outcome Scores, Imaging, and Arthroscopy.
| Authors, Year | Outcome Measures Reported | Outcome Scores | Imaging and Arthroscopy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bakay et al., 1998 | XR | NR | XR: 1 excellent, 2 good, 1 fair, 1 poor result |
| Drexler et al., 2015 | KS-F, KSKS | KS-F: Preoperatively 50.6, postoperatively 61.9
(P < 0.01) (median
scores) KSKS: Preoperatively 54.6, postoperatively 72.6 (P < 0.01) (median scores) |
NR |
| Fanceshchi et al., 2008 | IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm, VAS | IKDC: Preoperatively all had abnormal and severely abnormal
scores. Postoperatively 7 patients had normal and nearly
normal values, and 1 had abnormal value. Tegner: Preoperatively 3.7 (3-5), post-operatively 7 (5-8) (P < 0.05) Lysholm: Preoperatively 65.7 (49–88), post-operatively 94.6 (89-100) (P < 0.05) VAS: Preoperatively 7.2 (6-9), postoperatively 2 (0-5) (P < 0.05) |
NR |
| Gracitelli et al., 2017 | IKDC, KS-F, Modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel | IKDC total: Preoperatively 31.4 ± 12.6, post-operatively
48.8 ± 23.8 (P = 0.012) IKDC Pain: Preoperatively 6.2 ± 2.0, postoperatively 4.6 ± 3.2 (P = 0.111) IKDC function: Preoperatively 2.6 ± 1.9, postoperatively 5.3 ± 2.5 (P = 0.005) KS-F: Preoperatively 51.8 ± 23.7, postoperatively 71.7 ± 20.0 (P = 0.007) Modified Merle: Preoperatively 11.3 ± 1.7, postoperatively 14.5 ± 2.7 (P = 0.001) |
NR |
| Hangody et al., 2010 | Modified HSS | Modified HSS: Preoperatively 52, postoperatively 86 (P = 0.015) | NR |
| Kon et al., 2014 | IKDC, Tegner, Subjective | IKDC Subjective score: Preoperatively 42.5 ± 10.2,
postoperatively 68.4 ± 17.0. IKDC Objective score: Preoperatively had 27.3% normal and nearly normal knees, postoperatively had 85.7% normal and nearly normal knees Tegner: Preinjury 5.3 ± 2.5, pre-operatively 2.3 ± 2.1, post-operatively 4.4 ± 1.9 Subjective: 10 of the 11 patients (90.9%) reported a subjective improvement of symptoms and function after treatment |
NR |
| Kreuz et al., 2006 | Cincinnati, ICRS, MRI | Cincinnati: Preoperatively 4.0 ± 0.0, post-operatively 2.55
± 1.04 (P = 0.008) ICRS: Preoperatively 3.91 ± 0.3, Postoperatively 3.0 ± 0.77 (P = 0.008) |
MRI: Defect filling 2.64 ± 0.92, subchondral edema 2.55 ± 0.93, cartilage signal 2.55 ± 0.93, effusion 2.36 ± 1.03, overall score 2.64 ± 0.92 (used previously published scoring system 14 ) |
| Locht et al., 1984 | Subjective, ROM, XR | Subjective: Preoperatively 3.58, postoperatively
7.50 ROM: Either improved or stayed the same in all but 1 patient. |
XR: All knees showed at least slight collapse of the osseous component of the graft. The collapse measured three millimeters or less in 10 knees. |
| Ma et al., 2004 | Lysholm, arthroscopy, XR | Lysholm: Preoperatively 47.5 (46-49), postoperatively 80 (79-81) | Arthroscopy was performed in 2 patients: Showed uneven
surface and degenerative change with fibrillation XR: Narrowing of joint space over the lateral compartment |
| Shasha et al., 2003 | HSS, XR | HSS: Postoperatively 85.3 ± 11.0 points | XR: Radiographic evidence of allograft union to host bone in all cases, 3 cases of graft collapse in excess of 3 mm. There was no or mild degenerative changes in 21 patients and moderate or severe degenerative changes in 14. |
| Ueblacker et al., 2004 | Arthroscopy, XR, MRI | NR | Arthroscopy was performed in 1 patient: The osteochondral
cylinder was well integrated and flush with the articular
surface. XR: The osteochondral cylinders were congruent in the mediolateral tibial plateau. MRI: Vital cylinders, healing of the implanted plug and a congruent chondral surface was observed in all patients. |
| Wajsfisz et al., 2013 | IKDC, Tegner, KOOS | IKDC: Preoperatively 53.5 (37-66), postoperatively 95.4
(93.1-97.7) Tegner: Preoperatively 7 (6-8), postoperatively 7 (6-8) KOOS: Reported significant improvement in all patients |
NR |
| Yabumoto et al., 2017 | IKDC, Arthroscopy, ICRS, JOA | IKDC: Preoperatively 39.0 (13.0-57.1), post-operatively 72.4
(33.3-100) (P = 0.0022) JOA: Preoperatively 65.8 (30.0-85.0), postoperatively 85.8 (50.0-100) (P = 0.0022) |
Arthroscopy was performed in 7 patients at mean 14.9 months (range, 12-27 months): ICRS Cartilage Repair Assessment Score: 8.57 (3-12); with 2 patients needing second operation removed: 10.6 (9-12) |
IKDC = International Knee Documentation Committee; KS-F = Knee Society–Function; KSKS = Knee Society Knee Score; ICRS = International Cartilage Repair Society; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; KOOS = Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; VAS = visual analogue score; HSS = Hospital for Special Surgery; ROM = range of motion; XR = X-ray; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NR = not reported.