Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):14–20. doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_158_21

Table 3.

Comparisons of changes between transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation and control groups

TEDS Control P
△CL (ml/cmH2 O) −0.2 (−6.6-6) 0.75 (−3-6) 0.540
△Raw (cmH2 O/ml/s) 0 (−3-2) −0.10 (−2-1.0) 0.937
∆RR (bpm) 1 (−3-6) 0 (−6-3.3) 0.142
∆Vt (ml) 5 (−31-88) −10 (−104-49.8) 0.182
∆MV (L) 0.64 (−0.67-2.3) −0.64 (−2.5-0.78) 0.008
∆SpO2 (%) 0 (−1-2) 0 (−1-2.5) 0.780
∆RSBI −14 (−33-13.3) 0 (−10-10) 0.554
∆Pimax (cmH2 O) 1.0 (−2-−6) 0 (−1-−1) 0.233
∆Pemax (cmH2 O) 2 (−2-−10) 1 (−15-−8) 0.224

Data are expressed as median (25th-75th percentiles). Vt=Tidal volume, RR=Respiratory rate, MV=Minute volume, RSBI=Rapid shallow breathing index, CL=Lung compliance, Raw=Airway resistance, Pemax=Maximal expiratory pressure, Pimax=Maximum inspiratory mouth pressure, TEDS=Transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation