Table 3.
Author, year | Bracke et al.[11] 2005 | Dam and Bygum[12] 2008 | Tom Whittle et al.[17] 2011 | Almebayadh et al.[21] 2013 | Sandholdt et al.[7] 2014 | Present series | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of patients | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 7 | |
Sex | Male | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Female | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 3 | |
Age (years) | Range | 63-69 | 50-63 | 78-85 | 30-57 | 28-86 | 53-70 |
Average | 66 | 56.4 | 81.5 | 39.3 | 61 | 60.2 | |
Latency period | Range | 3-5 months | 4-8 weeks | 3 months | 7 weeks to several weeks | 1 week-3.5 years | 2 weeks-1 year |
Average | 4 months | 31.4 days | 3 months | 8 months | 11.4 weeks | ||
PPI associated | Pantoprazole | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Omeprazole | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
Esomeprazole | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | |
Lansoprazole | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | |
Rabeprazole | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Relapse episodes | Nil | Nil | Nil | 1 (pantoprazole) | 5 episodes* | 2 episodes** | |
Skin biopsy findings | SCLE | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 6 |
EM like | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
Not done | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |
DIF (skin biopsy) | Positive | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Negative | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 3 | |
Not done | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 4 | |
Antibodies | ANA | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 11.61% | 7 |
Anti-Ro | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 13.73% | 7 | |
Anti-La | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.33% | 4 | |
Others | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1.8% | 0 | |
Naranjo scale | Definite | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Probable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 5 | |
Possible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
Not done | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
Outcome | Complete remission | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 6 |
Partial remission | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
Death | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
DIF=Direct immunofluorescence, EM=Erythema multiforme, PPI=Proton pump inhibitor, SCLE=Subcutaneous lupus erythematosus. *Five relapse episodes, one each from pantoprazole and omeprazole and three episodes from lansoprazole. **Two relapse episodes, one each from pantoprazole and esomeprazole