Table 4. The effect of peer education between the intervention group and the control group (n = 1338).

Sample	Resilience	β	SE	t	P	95% CI
All subjects	Target focus	0.893	0.282	3.162	0.002	[0.339,1.447]
	Emotional control	1.766	0.389	4.543	<0.001	[1.004,2.529]
	Positive cognition	0.219	0.254	0.862	0.389	[-0.279,0.716]
	Family support	0.737	0.382	1.930	0.054	[-0.012,1.486]
	Interpersonal assistance	1.722	0.716	2.406	0.016	[0.318,3.126]
	Total resilience	5.391	1.094	4.930	<0.001	[3.246,7.536]
Male	Target focus	0.882	0.425	2.078	0.038	[0.049,1.716]
	Emotional control	1.935	0.445	4.350	<0.001	[1.061,2.808]
	Positive cognition	0.099	0.336	0.295	0.768	[-0.561,0.760]
	Family support	0.664	0.535	1.242	0.215	[-0.385,1.714]
	Interpersonal assistance	1.276	0.435	2.929	0.004	[0.421,2.131]
	Total resilience	4.889	1.223	3.997	<0.001	[2.488,7.290]
Female	Target focus	0.151	0.083	1.823	0.070	[-0.012,0.314]
	Emotional control	1.625	0.439	3.699	<0.001	[0.762,2.488]
	Positive cognition	0.351	0.326	1.077	0.282	[-0.289,0.991]
	Family support	0.052	0.093	0.563	0.574	[-0.131,0.235]
	Interpersonal assistance	2.302	1.060	2.171	0.030	[0.220,4.383]
	Total resilience	6.182	1.333	4.637	<0.001	[3.564,8.800]

Independent variable: Control versus Intervention.

Dependent variable: the difference of resilience between baseline and final follow-up.

Confounding factors including "relationship between parents", "relationship with father", "father’s educational level", "parenting style", "family economic status", and age.