Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;11:e75555. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75555

Figure 1. Overview of the ADAR2 deaminase domain (ADAR2-DD) deep mutational scan (DMS) and 5’-GAN-3’ enhancer editing screen.

(a) Lentiviral vectors comprising two copies of MS2-adRNA both targeting either a 5’ or a 3’ UAG target site for the DMS were created. For the 5’-GAN-3’ enhancer screen, the MS2-adRNAs targeted a 5’ or 3’ GAC site. The lentiviral vector alco contained a mCherry and hygromycin resistance marker. Libraries of single amino acid variants of the ADAR2-DD were created in a second lentiviral with a puromycin selection marker. For the 5’-GAN-3’ enhancer screen, the corresponding library was created in the hyperactive ADAR2-DD(E488Q) backbone. (b) HEK293FT cells were transduced with the MS2-adRNA lentiviruses at a high multiplicity of infection (MOI) and upon hygromycin selection, a single clone with high mCherry expression was selected. Four independent clonal cell lines were created, harboring MS2-adRNA targeting the 5’ and 3’ UAG and GAC sites. The clonal cell line bearing the MS2-adRNA was then transduced with the lentiviral library of MCP-ADAR2-DD variants at a low MOI to ensure delivery of a single variant per cell. Cells were then selected with puromycin. (c) During the processes of cellular transcription and translation, each cell produces the MS2-adRNA as well as MCP-ADAR2-DD variant. Upon translation in the cell, each MCP-ADAR2-DD variant, in combination with the MS2-adRNA, edits its own transcript creating a synonymous change. Cells were harvested, mRNA isolated and regions of the ADAR2-DD were amplified and sequenced. The fraction of edited reads was then computed for each mutant. (d) Replicate correlation for the ADAR2-DD DMS. The X and Y axes represent the log2 fold change in editing as compared to the ADAR2. (e) Structure of the ADAR2-DD bound to its substrate (PDB 5HP3) with the degree of mutability of each residue as measured by the DMS highlighted. Residues that are highly intolerant to mutations are colored red while residues that are highly mutable are colored yellow. Residues not assayed in this DMS are colored white. (f) Using the library chassis of the DMS, a screen of deaminase domain mutants (in an E488Q background) was performed to mine variants with improved activity against 5’-GAN-3’ RNA motifs. Replicate correlation for the 5’-GAN-3’ enhancer mutant screen. The X and Y axes represent the log2 fold change in editing as compared to the ADAR2. (g) Structure of the ADAR2-DD(E488Q) bound to its substrate (PDB 5ED1) with the N496 residue highlighted in red, the E488Q residue in cyan, the target adenosine in green, the orphaned cytosine in magenta, and the adenosine on the unedited strand that base pairs with the 5’ uracil flanking the target adenosine in orange. (h) The E488Q, N496F double mutant was validated by editing a GAA motif in the GAPDH CDS, a GAG motif in the KRAS CDS and GAC, GAT motifs in the RAB7A 3’ UTR. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). p-Values were computed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test. All experiments were carried out in HEK293FT cells.

Figure 1—source data 1. ADAR2 deaminase domain deep mutational scan and 5’-GAN-3’ enhancer editing screen.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Deep mutational scan (DMS) of the ADAR2 deaminase domain (ADAR2-DD).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(a) Schematic of the ADAR2-DD showing oligonucleotide pools used to create the DMS library along with editing sites and primer binding sites. Oligonucleotide libraries 1, 2, and 3 were assayed for editing at the sites located at the 5’ end while libraries 4, 5, and 6 were assayed for editing at the 3’ end. Libraries 1 and 2 were amplified using primers 5’ seq F and 5’ seq R2, library 3 with 5’ seq F and 5’ seq R, library 4 with 3’ seq F and 3’ seq R and libraries 5 and 6 with 3’ seq F2 and 3’ seq R. (b) Histogram of variant counts from the DMS; 4958 of the 4959 variants were detected with 4931 variants showing >50 reads per replicate. (c) Heatmaps illustrating impact of single amino acid substitutions in residues 340–600 on the ability of the ADAR2-DD to edit a UAG motif. Rectangles are colored according to the scale bar on the right depicting the Z-score. Diagonal bars indicate standard error. The amino acids in the wild-type ADAR2-DD are indicated in the heatmap with a. Amino acids are indicated on the left and grouped based on type of amino acid: positively charged, negatively charged, polar-neutral, non-polar, aromatic, and unique. The heatmap bars at the top represent amino acid conservation score and surface exposure, respectively.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Characterization of ADAR2 deaminase domain (ADAR2-DD) mutants.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(a) A panel of mutants from the pooled deep mutational scan (DMS) screens were individually validated in an arrayed luciferase assay using a cluc reporter bearing a UAG stop codon. The plots represent log2 fold change as compared to the wild-type ADAR2 for (i) the DMS screen and (ii) the arrayed luciferase assay. Values represent mean ± SEM for the luciferase assay (n > 2) and mean for the DMS (n = 2). p-Values were computed using Welch’s t-test; 72% of the validated samples were not significantly different from the data obtained in the screen (p > 0.05). Panel (iii) depicts the correlation between the luciferase assay and the DMS. The Pearson correlation between the arrayed validations and the data obtained in the screen was 0.818 while the Spearman (rank) correlation was 0.824. (b) A subset of mutants from panel a were validated by editing UAG sites in the GAPDH and KRAS CDS. Values represent mean (n = 2). All experiments were carried out in HEK293FT cells.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Characterization of ADAR2 deaminase domain (ADAR2-DD) E488Q, N496F mutant.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(a) The E488Q, N496F double mutant was validated in a luciferase assay using a cluc reporter bearing a UGA stop codon. The plot represents log2 fold change as compared to the ADAR2-DD(E488Q). Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 6). p-Values were computed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test. (b) Heatmap depicting hyper-editing observed with the N496F, E488Q double mutant corresponding to the RAB7A plot in Figure 1g. The red arrow indicates the target. (c) Editing activity of the E488Q, N496F double mutant against all 16 5’-GAN-3’ motifs was measured relative to the E488Q. Values represent mean (n = 2). All experiments were carried out in HEK293FT cells.