Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 2;28(3):452–460. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2225

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Arm A Arm B Arm C Arm D Total
(N = 8) (N = 24) (N = 14) (N = 30) (N = 76)
Selinexor Dose 50 mg/m2 BIW (n = 7), 60 mg BIW (n = 1)c 50 mg/m2 BIW 60 mg BIW 80 mg QW
Age (years)a, median (range) 58.0 (43–65) 50.5 (29–69) 52.0 (27–65) 56 (21–78) 56 (20–78)
Sex, n (%)
 Male 7 (87.5) 19 (79.2) 9 (64.3) 19 (63.3) 54 (71.1)
 Female 1 (12.5) 5 (20.8) 5 (35.7) 11 (36.7) 22 (28.9)
Prior lines of therapyb, median (range) 1.5 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–3) 1 (1–8) 1 (1–8)
Baseline Karnofsky Performance Status, n (%)
 ≤80% 5 (62.5) 9 (37.5) 5 (35.7) 14 (46.7) 33 (43.4)
 >80% 3 (37.5) 15 (62.5) 15 (62.5) 16 (53.3) 43 (56.6)

Note: Arm A was primarily designed to determine intratumoral pharmacokinetics, and arms B–D tested efficacy of different dose schedules.

Abbreviations: BIW, twice per week; QW, once per week.

aAt time of first dose.

bData missing for two patients in Arm C and one patient in Arm D.

cPatient treated after protocol update in version 4.0 in which the dose was changed to 60 mg flat.