Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 20;9:808905. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.808905

TABLE 1.

Top 10 bacteria at differential levels in the four groups.

Relative abundance (%) Group p-value
NP NM MP MM NP vs MP MP vs MM
p_proteobacteria 1.91 ± 0.20 2.08 ± 0.24 4.51 ± 1.20 2.40 ± 0.43 0.007 0.027
c_Gammaproteobacteria 0.69 ± 0.14 0.69 ± 0.22 3.29 ± 1.15 0.95 ± 0.39 0.005 0.011
o_Enterobacteriales 0.19 ± 0.05 0.27 ± 0.19 2.87 ± 1.14 0.64 ± 0.35 0.003 0.013
o_Lactobacillales 0.46 ± 0.49 0.38 ± 0.35 0.76 ± 0.57 0.71 ± 0.12 0.005 0.654
f_Enterobacteriaceae 0.19 ± 0.05 0.27 ± 0.19 2.87 ± 1.14 0.64 ± 0.35 0.003 0.013
f_Lactobacillaceae 0.37 ± 0.03 0.35 ± 0.03 0.66 ± 0.04 0.63 ± 0.10 0.001 0.689
g_Escherichia-Shigella 0.10 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.07 2.42 ± 1.07 0.39 ± 0.17 0.004 0.012
g_Alistipes 4.85 ± 0.68 7.05 ± 0.86 8.55 ± 0.81 6.48 ± 0.89 0.002 0.080
g_Lachnoclostridum 1.15 ± 0.12 3.36 ± 0.42 3.73 ± 0.61 2.83 ± 0.42 0.000 0.146
g_Prevotella_9 0.64 ± 0.03 0.41 ± 0.06 1.64 ± 0.11 1.06 ± 0.06 0.000 0.000

Significant changes of bacteria relative abundance in the four groups. “NP” represents the NS-PBS group, “NM” represents the NS-MSC group, “MP” represents the MPTP-PBS group, and “MM” represents the MPTP-MSC group. Statistical comparison by one-way ANOVA with post hoc comparisons of LSD. Data represent the mean ± SE, n = 12.