Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 20;12:829696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.829696

Table 4.

Structural model results.

BCa 95% CI
Hypothesis Std. beta Std. error t-value p-value LB UB VIF f2 R 2 Q 2
Direct effect H1: WLP -> HC 0.326 0.035 9.478 0.000 0.279 0.387 1.144 0.123 0.237 0.169
H2: WLP -> OSCA 0.098 0.029 3.422 0.000 0.045 0.144 1.209 0.016 0.491 0.315
H3: WLP -> DBLR 0.136 0.040 3.464 0.000 0.071 0.205 1.228 0.021 0.240 0.152
H4a: HC -> OSCA 0.654 0.026 25.286 0.000 0.611 0.696 1.209 0.697
H4b: HC -> DBLR 0.090 0.052 1.657 0.049 0.009 0.170 2.052 0.005
H5: OSCA -> DBLR 0.350 0.050 7.062 0.000 0.271 0.425 1.966 0.083
Mediating effect H6a: WLP -> HC -> DBLR 0.028 0.017 1.648 0.100 −0.006 0.062
H6b: HC -> OSCA -> DBLR 0.230 0.034 6.790 0.000 0.167 0.295
H6c: WLP -> HC -> OSCA-> DBLR 0.074 0.013 5.924 0.000 0.052 0.101
Moderating effect H7: WLP*PTI -> HC 0.106 0.054 1.963 0.017 0.036 0.197 0.021

WLP, wait for lower prices; HC, hesitation at checkout; OSCA, online shopping cart abandonment; DBLR, decision to buy from a land-based retailer; PTI, perceived transaction inconvenience.