Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;3(2):150. doi: 10.1007/s42979-022-01035-x

Table 1.

Comparative perspective with related AI works for COVID-19 detection

Model Dataset used Method Results Shortcoming (s)
Wang et al. [15] 15000 chest radiography images of confirmed COVID-19 positive and negative cases Deep convolutional neural network called COVIDNet Accuracy-92.4%, Sensitivity-80% Comparatively lower accuracy and sensitivity
Li et al. [16] 4356 Volumetric chest CT images that included community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and other non-pneumonia cases 3-Dimensional Convolutional ResNet-50 network, termed COVNetDeep AUC-0.96 High computational cost and requirement of professionals to analyze the results
Gozes et al. [17] CT images from 157 COVID affected patients ResNet-50 AUC-0.996 Relatively small testing dataset
Xu et al. [18] 618 CT samples from COVID-19 patients (219), influenza-A infected (224), and healthy individuals (175) Location attention network using ResNet-18 Accuracy-86.7% Lower accuracy
Ghoshal et al. [19] 5941 Chest radiography images samples from 4 classes: healthy, bacterial pneumonia, non-COVID-19 pneumonia Drop-weights based Bayesian CNNs Accuracy-89.92% Lower accuracy
Wang et al. [20] 1065 CT images (325 COVID, 740 Viral Pneumonia) Modified inception transfer-learning model Accuracy-79.3%, Specificity-83%, Sensitivity-67% Lower accuracy and imbalanced dataset
Fang et al. [21] 133 CT images of COVID-19 patients Multilayer perceptron combined with an LSTM AUC-0.954 Relatively smaller dataset size and lower accuracy
Jin Feng et al. [22] 970 CT images of COVID-19 positive and 1385 COVID-19 negative patients 2-Dimensional CNN Accuracy-94.98%, AUC-0.979 Lower accuracy and lack of generalization
Jin et al. [23] 1136 CT images (723 COVID-19 positive) 3-Dimensional UNet and ResNet-50 Specificity-92.2%, Sensitivity-97.4% Lower accuracy
Narin et al. [24] Chest X-ray images from 50 COVID-19 positive and 50 COVID-19 negative patients ResNet-50 Accuracy-98% Relatively small testing dataset
Chowdhury et al. [25] 1341 Normal, 1345 Viral Pneumonia and 190 COVID-19 chest X-ray images Combination of AlexNet, ResNet-18, DenseNet-201, and SqueezeNet Accuracy-98.3% High computational cost, large number of training hyperparameters, and class imbalance
Maghdid et al. [26] 170 X-ray and 361 CT images CNN augmented with a pre-trained AlexNet using transfer learning Accuracy-98% for X-ray images, Accuracy-94.1% for CT images High computational cost and lack of implementation in smart healthcare