Wang et al. [15] |
15000 chest radiography images of confirmed COVID-19 positive and negative cases |
Deep convolutional neural network called COVIDNet |
Accuracy-92.4, Sensitivity-80
|
Comparatively lower accuracy and sensitivity |
Li et al. [16] |
4356 Volumetric chest CT images that included community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and other non-pneumonia cases |
3-Dimensional Convolutional ResNet-50 network, termed COVNetDeep |
AUC-0.96 |
High computational cost and requirement of professionals to analyze the results |
Gozes et al. [17] |
CT images from 157 COVID affected patients |
ResNet-50 |
AUC-0.996 |
Relatively small testing dataset |
Xu et al. [18] |
618 CT samples from COVID-19 patients (219), influenza-A infected (224), and healthy individuals (175) |
Location attention network using ResNet-18 |
Accuracy-86.7
|
Lower accuracy |
Ghoshal et al. [19] |
5941 Chest radiography images samples from 4 classes: healthy, bacterial pneumonia, non-COVID-19 pneumonia |
Drop-weights based Bayesian CNNs |
Accuracy-89.92
|
Lower accuracy |
Wang et al. [20] |
1065 CT images (325 COVID, 740 Viral Pneumonia) |
Modified inception transfer-learning model |
Accuracy-79.3, Specificity-83, Sensitivity-67
|
Lower accuracy and imbalanced dataset |
Fang et al. [21] |
133 CT images of COVID-19 patients |
Multilayer perceptron combined with an LSTM |
AUC-0.954 |
Relatively smaller dataset size and lower accuracy |
Jin Feng et al. [22] |
970 CT images of COVID-19 positive and 1385 COVID-19 negative patients |
2-Dimensional CNN |
Accuracy-94.98, AUC-0.979 |
Lower accuracy and lack of generalization |
Jin et al. [23] |
1136 CT images (723 COVID-19 positive) |
3-Dimensional UNet and ResNet-50 |
Specificity-92.2, Sensitivity-97.4
|
Lower accuracy |
Narin et al. [24] |
Chest X-ray images from 50 COVID-19 positive and 50 COVID-19 negative patients |
ResNet-50 |
Accuracy-98
|
Relatively small testing dataset |
Chowdhury et al. [25] |
1341 Normal, 1345 Viral Pneumonia and 190 COVID-19 chest X-ray images |
Combination of AlexNet, ResNet-18, DenseNet-201, and SqueezeNet |
Accuracy-98.3
|
High computational cost, large number of training hyperparameters, and class imbalance |
Maghdid et al. [26] |
170 X-ray and 361 CT images |
CNN augmented with a pre-trained AlexNet using transfer learning |
Accuracy-98 for X-ray images, Accuracy-94.1 for CT images |
High computational cost and lack of implementation in smart healthcare |