Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2019 May 5;75(3):745–756. doi: 10.1111/biom.13053

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Small factor effects (λ1 = 0.25). The panels, labeled A-C, show the average number of true positives (TP), the average number of false positives (FP), and the average estimate of the direct effect for the four methods (red = LVMA; blue = TMAO; green = TMAR; purple = IMA) and for four scenarios (a: βEF,1 = 0.4, λ0 = 0.4; b: βEF,1 = 0.4, λ0 = 0.5; c: βEF,1 = 0.5, λ0 = 0.4; d: βEF,1 = 0.5, λ0 = 0.5) based on 1000 simulations. Top and bottom panel are for studies with continuous and binary outcomes, respectively (N = 500). The whiskers show two standard errors around the average estimates.